Beydon L, Pelluchon C, Beloucif S, Baghdadi H, Baumann A, Bazin J-E, Bizouarn P, Crozier S, Devalois B, Eon B, Fieux F, Frot C, Gisquet E, Guibet Lafaye C, Kentish-Barnes N, Muzard O, Nicolas-Robin A, Lopez M O, Roussin F, Puybasset L
Pôle d'anesthésie-réanimation, centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers cedex 01, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Sep;31(9):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Management of the end of life is a major social issue which was addressed in France by law, on April 22nd 2005. Nevertheless, a debate has emerged within French society about the legalization of euthanasia and/or assisted suicide (E/AS). This issue raises questions for doctors and most especially for anesthetists and intensive care physicians.
To highlight, dispassionately and without dogmatism, key points taken from the published literature and the experience of countries which have legislated for E/AS.
The current French law addresses most of the end of life issues an intensive care physician might encounter. It is credited for imposing palliative care when therapies have become senseless and are withdrawn. However, this requirement for palliative care is generally applied too late in the course of a fatal illness. There is a great need for more education and stronger incentives for early action in this area. On the rare occasions when E/AS is requested, either by the patient or their loved-ones, it often results from a failure to consider that treatments have become senseless and conflict with patient's best interest. The implementation of E/AS cannot be reduced to a simple affirmation of the Principle of autonomy. Such procedures present genuine difficulties and the risk of drift.
We deliver a message of prudence and caution. Should we address painful end of life and moral suffering issues, by suppressing the subject, i.e. ending the patient's life, when comprehensive palliative care has not first been fully granted to all patients in need of it ?
临终管理是一个重大的社会问题,法国于2005年4月22日通过法律对此进行了规定。然而,法国社会内部就安乐死和/或协助自杀(E/AS)合法化展开了一场辩论。这个问题给医生,尤其是麻醉师和重症监护医生带来了疑问。
客观且不带教条地强调从已发表文献以及已立法允许E/AS的国家的经验中获取的要点。
法国现行法律涵盖了重症监护医生可能遇到的大多数临终问题。它因在治疗变得无意义并被撤销时强制实施姑息治疗而受到赞誉。然而,这种对姑息治疗的要求在致命疾病过程中通常应用得太晚。在这一领域,非常需要更多教育以及更强有力的早期行动激励措施。在极少数情况下,当患者或其亲人要求E/AS时,这往往是由于没有认识到治疗已变得无意义且与患者的最大利益相冲突。E/AS的实施不能简化为对自主原则的简单肯定。此类程序存在真正的困难和偏差风险。
我们传达谨慎的信息。当并非所有需要全面姑息治疗的患者都首先得到充分的姑息治疗时,我们是否应该通过压制这个问题,即结束患者的生命,来解决痛苦的临终和道德痛苦问题?