• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我真希望能早点看到这个检测结果!”:对基层医疗中检测结果管理系统的不满

"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care.

作者信息

Poon Eric G, Gandhi Tejal K, Sequist Thomas D, Murff Harvey J, Karson Andrew S, Bates David W

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass. 02120, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2223-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223
PMID:15534158
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failure to review and follow up on outpatient test results in a timely manner represents a patient safety and malpractice concern. Therefore, we sought to identify problems in current test result management systems and possible ways to improve these systems.

METHODS

We surveyed 262 physicians working in 15 internal medicine practices affiliated with 2 large urban teaching hospitals (response rate, 64%). We asked physicians about systems they used and the amount of time they spent managing test results. We asked them to report delays in reviewing test results and their overall satisfaction with their management of test results. We also asked physicians to rate features they would find useful in a new test result management system.

RESULTS

Overall, 83% of respondents reported at least 1 delay in reviewing test results during the previous 2 months. Despite reporting that they spent on average 74 minutes per clinical day managing test results, only 41% of physicians reported being satisfied with how they managed test results. Satisfaction was associated with fewer self-reported delays in reviewing test results. Physicians who actively tracked their test orders to completion were also more likely to be satisfied. The most highly desired features of a test result management system were tools to help physicians generate result letters to patients, prioritize their workflow, and track test orders to completion.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in test result review are common, and many physicians are not satisfied with how they manage test results. Tools to improve test result management in office practices need to improve workflow efficiency and track test orders to completion.

摘要

背景

未能及时复查和跟进门诊检查结果存在患者安全及医疗事故方面的问题。因此,我们试图找出当前检查结果管理系统中的问题以及改进这些系统的可能方法。

方法

我们对在两家大型城市教学医院附属的15个内科诊所工作的262名医生进行了调查(回复率为64%)。我们询问医生他们使用的系统以及他们花费在管理检查结果上的时间。我们要求他们报告复查检查结果的延迟情况以及他们对检查结果管理的总体满意度。我们还要求医生对他们认为在新的检查结果管理系统中有用的功能进行评分。

结果

总体而言,83%的受访者报告在过去两个月中至少有一次复查检查结果的延迟。尽管报告称他们平均每个临床日花费74分钟管理检查结果,但只有41%的医生表示对他们管理检查结果的方式感到满意。满意度与自我报告的复查检查结果延迟较少有关。积极跟踪检查医嘱直至完成的医生也更有可能感到满意。检查结果管理系统最受期待的功能是帮助医生生成给患者的结果信函、优化工作流程以及跟踪检查医嘱直至完成的工具。

结论

检查结果复查延迟很常见,许多医生对他们管理检查结果的方式不满意。改善门诊检查结果管理的工具需要提高工作流程效率并跟踪检查医嘱直至完成。

相似文献

1
"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care.“我真希望能早点看到这个检测结果!”:对基层医疗中检测结果管理系统的不满
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2223-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223.
2
Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication.自动化检验结果管理系统对患者检验结果沟通满意度的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12;167(20):2233-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.20.2233.
3
German physicians "on strike"--shedding light on the roots of physician dissatisfaction.德国医生“罢工”——揭示医生不满情绪的根源。
Health Policy. 2007 Aug;82(3):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
4
Follow-up of outpatient test results: a survey of house-staff practices and perceptions.门诊检查结果的随访:住院医师实践与认知的调查
Am J Med Qual. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):178-84. doi: 10.1177/1062860605285049.
5
Evolving dissatisfaction among primary care physicians.基层医疗医生中日益增长的不满情绪。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Oct;8(10):890-901.
6
Hands on: is there an association between doing procedures and job satisfaction?实际操作:进行医疗程序操作与工作满意度之间是否存在关联?
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jan;53(1):93, 93:e.1-5, 92.
7
Electronic results management in pediatric ambulatory care: qualitative assessment.儿科门诊护理中的电子结果管理:定性评估
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123 Suppl 2:S85-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1755G.
8
Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results.未向患者告知具有临床意义的门诊检查结果的频率。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jun 22;169(12):1123-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.130.
9
Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.2006年美国门诊医生及其诊所对电子病历的使用情况
Adv Data. 2007 Oct 26(393):1-7.
10
Characteristics of office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2003-04.2003 - 2004年美国门诊医生及其执业情况的特征
Vital Health Stat 13. 2007 Jan(164):1-34.

引用本文的文献

1
A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.错失检验结果的虚拟突破系列协作:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440269. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40269.
2
A Multilevel Primary Care Intervention to Improve Follow-Up of Overdue Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.多层面初级保健干预以改善逾期异常癌症筛查检测结果的随访:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 10;330(14):1348-1358. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.18755.
3
Clinical decision support with a comprehensive in-EHR patient tracking system improves genetic testing follow up.
通过综合的电子健康记录(EHR)患者跟踪系统提供临床决策支持可改善基因检测的随访。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1274-1283. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad070.
4
Deep learning-based detection of patients with bone metastasis from Japanese radiology reports.基于深度学习的日本放射学报告中骨转移患者的检测。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):900-908. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01413-2. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Primary Care Practitioner Perceptions on the Follow-up of Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results.初级保健医生对异常癌症筛查检测结果的随访看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2234194. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34194.
6
Natural Language Processing to Identify Abnormal Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Screening Test Results from Unstructured Reports to Support Timely Follow-up.自然语言处理技术识别异常的乳腺、肺部和宫颈癌筛查测试结果,以支持及时的随访。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:433-437. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220112.
7
Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals.知情还是焦虑:患者对通过电子患者门户网站发布敏感度不断提高的检测结果的偏好。
Health Technol (Berl). 2022;12(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00628-5. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Performance of Diabetes and Kidney Disease Screening Scores in Contemporary United States and Korean Populations.当代美国和韩国人群中糖尿病和肾脏疾病筛查评分的表现。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Mar;46(2):273-285. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0054. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Multilevel Follow-up of Cancer Screening (mFOCUS): Protocol for a multilevel intervention to improve the follow-up of abnormal cancer screening test results.多层面癌症筛查随访(mFOCUS):改善异常癌症筛查检测结果随访的多层次干预方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;109:106533. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106533. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.为何检测结果仍会“失联”无法跟进:一项关于实施差距的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.