Poon Eric G, Gandhi Tejal K, Sequist Thomas D, Murff Harvey J, Karson Andrew S, Bates David W
Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass. 02120, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2223-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223.
Failure to review and follow up on outpatient test results in a timely manner represents a patient safety and malpractice concern. Therefore, we sought to identify problems in current test result management systems and possible ways to improve these systems.
We surveyed 262 physicians working in 15 internal medicine practices affiliated with 2 large urban teaching hospitals (response rate, 64%). We asked physicians about systems they used and the amount of time they spent managing test results. We asked them to report delays in reviewing test results and their overall satisfaction with their management of test results. We also asked physicians to rate features they would find useful in a new test result management system.
Overall, 83% of respondents reported at least 1 delay in reviewing test results during the previous 2 months. Despite reporting that they spent on average 74 minutes per clinical day managing test results, only 41% of physicians reported being satisfied with how they managed test results. Satisfaction was associated with fewer self-reported delays in reviewing test results. Physicians who actively tracked their test orders to completion were also more likely to be satisfied. The most highly desired features of a test result management system were tools to help physicians generate result letters to patients, prioritize their workflow, and track test orders to completion.
Delays in test result review are common, and many physicians are not satisfied with how they manage test results. Tools to improve test result management in office practices need to improve workflow efficiency and track test orders to completion.
未能及时复查和跟进门诊检查结果存在患者安全及医疗事故方面的问题。因此,我们试图找出当前检查结果管理系统中的问题以及改进这些系统的可能方法。
我们对在两家大型城市教学医院附属的15个内科诊所工作的262名医生进行了调查(回复率为64%)。我们询问医生他们使用的系统以及他们花费在管理检查结果上的时间。我们要求他们报告复查检查结果的延迟情况以及他们对检查结果管理的总体满意度。我们还要求医生对他们认为在新的检查结果管理系统中有用的功能进行评分。
总体而言,83%的受访者报告在过去两个月中至少有一次复查检查结果的延迟。尽管报告称他们平均每个临床日花费74分钟管理检查结果,但只有41%的医生表示对他们管理检查结果的方式感到满意。满意度与自我报告的复查检查结果延迟较少有关。积极跟踪检查医嘱直至完成的医生也更有可能感到满意。检查结果管理系统最受期待的功能是帮助医生生成给患者的结果信函、优化工作流程以及跟踪检查医嘱直至完成的工具。
检查结果复查延迟很常见,许多医生对他们管理检查结果的方式不满意。改善门诊检查结果管理的工具需要提高工作流程效率并跟踪检查医嘱直至完成。