Suppr超能文献

深层巩膜切除术与有或无超声乳化白内障吸除术的穿刺小梁切除术:一项随机临床试验

Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with or without phacoemulsification: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Cillino Salvatore, Di Pace Francesco, Casuccio Alessandra, Calvaruso Liborio, Morreale Daniele, Vadalà Maria, Lodato Gaetano

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2004 Dec;13(6):500-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000137869.18156.81.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy without implant with Crozafon-De Laage punch trabeculectomy, and to evaluate the effect of simultaneous temporal approach phacoemulsification on both techniques.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology of the University of Palermo.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients and intervention procedures: Sixty-five patients (65 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG): 32 eyes underwent non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS), 17 as single procedure and 15 combined with phacoemulsification (phaco-NPDS), and 33 eyes underwent punch trabeculectomy (PT), 18 single and 15 with phaco (phaco-PT). The patients were randomly assigned to each procedure. No adjuvants, such as Nd: YAG laser goniopuncture, laser suturelysis, and antimetabolites were used.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative complications, number of antiglaucoma medications, and IOP level were checked at each control. Complete success indicated the achievement of the target IOP without antiglaucoma medications, while qualified success indicated the same goal with or without medications. These categories were assessed at two target IOP levels, namely < or =21 mm Hg and < or =17 mm Hg in all four groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 22.5 +/- 2.5 months. The mean preoperative IOP was 30.2 mm Hg in NPDS eyes, 26.8 in phaco-NPDS eyes, 32.1 in PT eyes, and 27.0 in phaco-PT ones, without significant intergroup difference. At the end point the mean IOP was 17.7 +/- 0.8, 15.7 +/- 0.9, 14.2 +/- 1.1, and 13.8 +/- 1.1 mm Hg respectively with postoperative IOP significantly lower (P = 0.005) than preoperative IOP in all groups. No difference was observed among groups at any observation time when simple and combined surgery were compared. Significant difference at the end point was found between NPDS and PT (P = 0.030). As for complete and qualified success with a < or =21 and < or =17 mm Hg target IOP no significant differences were noticed in all groups. Among postoperative complications, hypotony was significantly more frequent in both PT groups when compared with the NPDS groups. The same was true, but relating only to the single procedures, for shallow anterior chamber and choroidal detachment. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves relating to the qualified success rate in the four surgical groups for a < or =21 mm Hg target IOP (log rank, P = 0.564) and for a < or =17 mm Hg target IOP (log rank, P = 0.591) showed no significant intergroup differences. When the < or =21 mm Hg target IOP was considered, a mild positive trend in combined procedures (both phaco-NPDS and phaco-PT) was found in comparison with simple procedures. At lower IOP target (ie, < or =17 mm Hg) a better trend was found in favor of simple or combined PT procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques, NPDS and PT, without enhancements (ie, implants or antimetabolites) control IOP efficaciously at our end point. Phacoemulsification combined with penetrating and non-penetrating procedures does not seem to interfere with final results. When a lower target IOP and probability of success over time are considered, PT, single or combined, exhibits a better trend. PT, therefore, could be more suitable for higher IOP levels or longer life expectancies.

摘要

目的

比较不植入物的非穿透性深层巩膜切除术与Crozafon-De Laage打孔小梁切除术的疗效,并评估同期颞侧入路白内障超声乳化术对这两种技术的影响。

设置

巴勒莫大学眼科。

设计

前瞻性随机临床试验。患者及干预程序:65例(65眼)原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)或剥脱性青光眼(PEXG)患者:32眼接受非穿透性深层巩膜切除术(NPDS),其中17眼为单一手术,15眼联合白内障超声乳化术(白内障超声乳化术-NPDS);33眼接受打孔小梁切除术(PT),其中18眼为单一手术,15眼联合白内障超声乳化术(白内障超声乳化术-PT)。患者被随机分配至每种手术。未使用辅助手段,如钕:钇铝石榴石激光房角穿刺、激光缝线松解及抗代谢药物。

主要观察指标

每次复查时检查术后并发症、抗青光眼药物数量及眼压水平。完全成功指在不用抗青光眼药物的情况下达到目标眼压,而合格成功指无论是否使用药物达到相同目标。在四个组中,在两个目标眼压水平,即≤21 mmHg和≤17 mmHg时评估这些类别。

结果

平均随访期为22.5±2.5个月。NPDS组术前平均眼压为30.2 mmHg,白内障超声乳化术-NPDS组为26.8 mmHg,PT组为32.1 mmHg,白内障超声乳化术-PT组为27.0 mmHg,组间无显著差异。终点时,平均眼压分别为17.7±0.8、15.7±0.9、14.2±1.1和13.8±1.1 mmHg,所有组术后眼压均显著低于术前眼压(P = 0.005)。比较单纯手术和联合手术时,在任何观察时间组间均未观察到差异。终点时NPDS组和PT组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.030)。对于目标眼压≤21 mmHg和≤17 mmHg的完全成功和合格成功,所有组均未发现显著差异。在术后并发症中,与NPDS组相比,两个PT组低眼压明显更常见。浅前房和脉络膜脱离也是如此,但仅与单一手术有关。四个手术组中目标眼压≤21 mmHg(对数秩,P = 0.564)和目标眼压≤17 mmHg(对数秩,P = 0.591)的合格成功率的Kaplan-Meier累积生存曲线显示组间无显著差异。当考虑目标眼压≤21 mmHg时,与单纯手术相比,联合手术(白内障超声乳化术-NPDS和白内障超声乳化术-PT)有轻度阳性趋势。在较低的眼压目标(即≤17 mmHg)时,发现单纯或联合PT手术有更好的趋势。

结论

在我们研究的终点,NPDS和PT这两种技术在不使用增强手段(即植入物或抗代谢药物)的情况下均能有效控制眼压。白内障超声乳化术联合穿透性和非穿透性手术似乎不影响最终结果。当考虑较低的目标眼压和随时间推移的成功概率时,单纯或联合的PT手术表现出更好的趋势。因此,PT可能更适合较高的眼压水平或较长的预期寿命。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验