Ducasse Eric, Calisti Annalisa, Speziale Francesco, Rizzo Luigi, Misuraca Maria, Fiorani Paolo
Department of Vascular Surgery, Tripode-Pellegin Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 Sep;18(5):521-6. doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0075-9. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
Aortic stent graft infection is uncommon. Most cases have been described anecdotaly in single-case reports. After observing one case in our experience, we decided to review the literature and contact centers performing endovascular aortic repair to determine the frequency, risk factors, and current treatment of stent graft infection. The literature was reviewed and the authors of identified articles were contacted for further information. In addition, 40 centers specializing in endovascular treatment were contacted by means a dedicated questionnaire. A total of 65 aortic stent graft infections were identified, including 43 reported cases and 22 previously unpublished cases that were observed at specialized centers. Stent grafts were implanted in the aorta in 50 cases and in the iliac artery in 15 cases. The frequency of infection was 0.43%. The gender ratio was 4:1 (M:F). Twenty-three percent of patients had immunodeficiency factors. Placement was performed in an interventional radiology suite in 62.5% of cases and in a sterile operating theater in 37.5%. Also, 35.5% of patients underwent other vascular procedures during the course of study and 29.2% stent grafts benefited from adjuvant endovascular procedures. Infection was classified as low grade in 35.4% of patients and high grade in 64.6%. Thirty-one percent of infections were associated with aortoenteric fistula. The offending microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus in 54.5% of cases. Treatment was conservative in 18% of cases and surgical in 82%. Surgical treatment consisted of stent graft removal followed by either extraanatomical bypass (59.5%) or in situ prosthetic reconstruction (40.5%). Mortality was 18% overall, 36.4% after conservative treatment and 14% after surgical treatment ( p = 0.083). Mortality was 16% after surgical treatment with extraanatomical bypass vs. 5.8% surgical treatment with in situ reconstruction. From these results we conclude that stent graft infection is an uncommon occurrence associated with poorly defined risk factors. Surgical treatment with complete excision of the infected stent graft followed by in situ reconstruction provides the best outcome. Establishment of a multicenter register to record such complications is needed to confirm the findings of this study.
主动脉覆膜支架感染并不常见。大多数病例在单病例报告中已有零星描述。在我们观察到1例病例后,我们决定回顾文献并联系开展血管腔内主动脉修复术的中心,以确定覆膜支架感染的发生率、危险因素及当前的治疗方法。我们回顾了文献,并联系了已发表文章的作者以获取更多信息。此外,我们通过一份专门的问卷联系了40个专注于血管腔内治疗的中心。共识别出65例主动脉覆膜支架感染病例,包括43例已报道病例和22例在专业中心观察到的此前未发表的病例。覆膜支架植入主动脉50例,植入髂动脉15例。感染发生率为0.43%。男女比例为4:1(男:女)。23%的患者有免疫缺陷因素。62.5%的病例在介入放射科进行植入操作,37.5%在无菌手术室进行。此外,35.5%的患者在研究过程中接受了其他血管手术,29.2%的覆膜支架接受了辅助血管腔内手术。35.4%的患者感染为低级别,64.6%为高级别。31%的感染与主动脉肠瘘相关。54.5%的病例中致病微生物为金黄色葡萄球菌。18%的病例采用保守治疗,82%采用手术治疗。手术治疗包括移除覆膜支架,随后进行解剖外旁路手术(59.5%)或原位人工血管重建(40.5%)。总体死亡率为18%,保守治疗后为36.4%,手术治疗后为14%(p = 0.083)。解剖外旁路手术治疗后的死亡率为16% vs原位重建手术治疗后的5.8%。从这些结果我们得出结论,覆膜支架感染是一种罕见情况,相关危险因素尚不明确。手术彻底切除感染的覆膜支架并随后进行原位重建可提供最佳预后。需要建立一个多中心登记系统来记录此类并发症,以证实本研究的结果。