Dimdins Girts, Montgomery Henry
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Nov;45(5):417-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00423.x.
Two basic factors influence mutual ratings of social groups: in-group favoritism (related to the evaluative aspects of a rating) and the perception of shared reality (related to the descriptive aspects). In two studies, we examine the usefulness of Peabody's (1968) method of separating evaluative and descriptive aspects of rating in intergroup judgments. In Study 1, Latvian and Russian students made different evaluations of both groups, but the same groups agreed on the descriptive ratings. In Study 2, male and female psychology students rated each other from own, in-group, and out-group perspectives. The participants did not show any in-group favoritism in their own ratings, but they expected their fellow students to be in-group biased. The participants agreed on the descriptive ratings of both groups. The results demonstrate that shared reality influences intergroup ratings, despite differences in evaluations.
内群体偏袒（与评价的评估方面相关）和共享现实的认知（与描述方面相关）。在两项研究中，我们检验了皮博迪（1968年）将评价的评估和描述方面在群体间判断中进行分离的方法的有用性。在研究1中，拉脱维亚和俄罗斯学生对两个群体做出了不同评价，但相同群体在描述性评分上达成了一致。在研究2中，男女心理学专业学生从自身、内群体和外群体的角度对彼此进行了评分。参与者在自己的评分中未表现出任何内群体偏袒，但他们预期自己的同学会有内群体偏见。参与者在两个群体的描述性评分上达成了一致。结果表明，尽管评价存在差异，但共享现实会影响群体间评分。
