Arvidsson D, Slinde F, Hulthèn L
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Mar;59(3):376-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602084.
To validate a physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (PAQA) adapted from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
Energy expenditure was measured during a 14-day period with doubly labelled water (DLW). PAQA was administered as an interview at the end of the period, asking for physical activity in school, during transportation and leisure-time, during a habitual week. Energy expenditure (EE(PAQA)) was calculated as the product of total physical activity + sleep and predicted resting metabolic rate, and was compared to energy expenditure from DLW (EE(DLW)), thermic effect of feeding excluded.
Participants were recruited from grade 9 in a compulsory school in Göteborg, Sweden. All data were collected at school, and distribution of DLW and measuring of resting metabolic rate were performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
A total of 33 adolescents (16 girls, 17 boys) 15.7 (0.4) y performed all measurements.
: For the whole group, PAQA underestimated energy expenditure by 3.8 (1.7) MJ (P<0.001). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.62, P<0.001) between EE(PAQA) and EE(DLW), but not for boys (r = 0.42, P = 0.090) and girls (r = 0.33, P = 0.22) separately.
PAQA is not able to predict energy expenditure in Swedish adolescents, largely explained by the amount of unreported time. The ability to rank adolescents energy expenditure is questioned because of the gender effect, although we found a strong correlation for the whole group.
验证一份改编自国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)的青少年体力活动问卷(PAQA)。
在14天的时间里用双标水(DLW)测量能量消耗。在该时间段结束时通过访谈方式发放PAQA,询问在习惯周内学校、交通和休闲时间的体力活动情况。能量消耗(EE(PAQA))通过总体力活动+睡眠与预测静息代谢率的乘积来计算,并与排除食物热效应后的DLW能量消耗(EE(DLW))进行比较。
参与者从瑞典哥德堡一所义务制学校的九年级学生中招募。所有数据在学校收集,DLW的发放和静息代谢率的测量在萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院进行。
共有33名青少年(16名女孩,17名男孩),年龄15.7(0.4)岁,完成了所有测量。
对于整个群体,PAQA低估能量消耗3.8(1.7)兆焦耳(P<0.001)。EE(PAQA)与EE(DLW)之间存在强相关性(r = 0.62,P<0.001),但男孩(r = 0.42,P = 0.090)和女孩(r = 0.33,P = 0.22)分别不存在这种相关性。
PAQA无法预测瑞典青少年的能量消耗,这在很大程度上是由于未报告时间的数量所致。尽管我们发现整个群体存在强相关性,但由于性别效应,对青少年能量消耗进行排名的能力受到质疑。