Alemán-Mateo H, Salazar G, Hernández-Triana M, Valencia M E
Coordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC (CIAD, AC), Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Nov;60(11):1258-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602446. Epub 2006 May 24.
The objective of this study was to assess total energy expenditure (TEE), resting metabolic rate (RMR) and physical activity level (PAL), and to estimate energy requirements (ERs) in free-living elderly subjects from Cuba, Chile and Mexico.
Cross-sectional study designed to estimate ERs.
Rural regions of Cuba, Chile and Mexico.
Forty subjects >60 years old were selected to participate in this study.
A dose of doubly labeled water (DLW) was administered and urine samples were collected in the following 12-14 days. From the isotopic analysis, TEE was derived. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry.
TEE in Chilean (8.8+/-1.6 MJ/day) and Cuban (8.3+/-1.3 MJ/day) elderly was not different, and was higher for the Mexican group (9.5+/-1.5 MJ/day) (P < 0.0001). RMR was not different between countries. PAL and activity energy expenditure (AEE) were only different between Chile and Mexico (P < 0.002). For the three regions, overall PALs were 1.70+/-0.16 for male and 1.62+/-0.13 for female subjects (P < 0.02), and AEE was 3.05+/-0.66 and 2.27+/-0.66 MJ/day for male and female subjects, respectively (P < 0.001). Predictive equations (MJ/day) were RMR = 1.6447 + 0.05714 x weight (kg) + 0.449 sex (male = 1; female = 0) (R2 = 0.75; SEE = 0.479) and TEE = 3.414 + 0.0795 x weight (kg) + 1.227 x sex (male = 1; female = 0) (R2 = 0.75; SEE = 0.668).
There were differences in TEE and PAL owing to sex and region. The average PAL in men was higher than the PAL reported either with factorial approach or with the DLW method in elderly. Predictive ER equations based on RMR and TEE gave very similar results to calculations from the 2004 FAO/WHO/UNU report.
本研究旨在评估古巴、智利和墨西哥自由生活的老年受试者的总能量消耗(TEE)、静息代谢率(RMR)和身体活动水平(PAL),并估算能量需求(ER)。
旨在估算ER的横断面研究。
古巴、智利和墨西哥的农村地区。
选择40名60岁以上的受试者参与本研究。
给予一剂双标水(DLW),并在接下来的12 - 14天收集尿液样本。通过同位素分析得出TEE。通过间接测热法测量RMR。
智利(8.8±1.6兆焦/天)和古巴(8.3±1.3兆焦/天)老年受试者的TEE无差异,而墨西哥组(9.5±1.5兆焦/天)的TEE更高(P < 0.0001)。各国之间的RMR无差异。PAL和活动能量消耗(AEE)仅在智利和墨西哥之间存在差异(P < 0.002)。对于这三个地区,男性总体PAL为1.70±0.16,女性为1.62±0.13(P < 0.02),男性和女性的AEE分别为3.05±0.66和2.27±0.66兆焦/天(P < 0.001)。预测方程(兆焦/天)为RMR = 1.6447 + 0.05714×体重(千克) + 0.449×性别(男性 = 1;女性 = 0)(R² = 0.75;标准误 = 0.479),TEE = 3.414 + 0.0795×体重(千克) + 1.227×性别(男性 = 1;女性 = 0)(R² = 0.75;标准误 = 0.668)。
TEE和PAL因性别和地区而异。男性的平均PAL高于老年人群中采用因子法或DLW法报告的PAL。基于RMR和TEE的预测ER方程与2004年粮农组织/世界卫生组织/联合国大学报告中的计算结果非常相似。