Smith A S A, Cunningham S J
Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Oct;26(5):499-506. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.499.
The aims of this interview-based questionnaire study were to establish which factors influence willingness-to-pay (WTP) for orthognathic treatment and to compare WTP values, from both members of the general public and orthognathic patients, with the actual cost of treatment, the hypothesis being that the more highly valued the intervention, the higher the WTP value. Data were collected from 88 orthognathic patients and a convenience sample of 100 adults using the so-called 'payment card' method. Demographic data were recorded, as well as ability to pay, incisor relationship, occupation, and level of education. In addition, the resources used in orthognathic treatment were estimated for five patients who participated in the study. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean WTP values for the public and patient groups. Patients were prepared to pay [see symbol in tex]2750 more than members of the general public. In addition, a significant relationship was found between WTP and incisor relationship in the patient group, with Class II division 1 patients prepared to pay [see symbol in text]3130 more than those with Class III malocclusions. Ability to pay did not significantly affect WTP. The mean total costs estimated for orthognathic treatment were lower than the mean patient WTP value and similar to the mean WTP value for the public group. In terms of cost-benefit, it appears that orthognathic treatment provides 'good value for money'. This study also showed that both patients and the general public were prepared to place a monetary value on the correction of dentofacial deformity and that this form of economic evaluation is a useful tool in monitoring health care in the UK.
这项基于访谈的问卷调查研究旨在确定哪些因素会影响正颌治疗的支付意愿,并比较普通公众和正颌患者的支付意愿值与实际治疗成本,假设是干预措施的价值越高,支付意愿值就越高。使用所谓的“支付卡”方法从88名正颌患者和100名成年人的便利样本中收集数据。记录了人口统计学数据、支付能力、切牙关系、职业和教育水平。此外,还对参与研究的5名患者的正颌治疗所使用的资源进行了估算。结果显示,公众组和患者组的平均支付意愿值之间存在显著差异。患者比普通公众愿意多支付[见原文符号]2750。此外,在患者组中发现支付意愿与切牙关系之间存在显著关系,安氏II类1分类患者比安氏III类错牙合患者愿意多支付[见原文符号]3130。支付能力对支付意愿没有显著影响。正颌治疗的平均总成本估计低于患者的平均支付意愿值,与公众组的平均支付意愿值相似。就成本效益而言,正颌治疗似乎“性价比高”。这项研究还表明,患者和普通公众都愿意为牙颌面畸形的矫正赋予货币价值,并且这种经济评估形式是监测英国医疗保健的有用工具。