Suppr超能文献

扎鲁司特治疗急性哮喘:一项随机、双盲、多中心试验的评估

Zafirlukast treatment for acute asthma: evaluation in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.

作者信息

Silverman Robert A, Nowak Richard M, Korenblat Phillip E, Skobeloff Emil, Chen Yusong, Bonuccelli Catherine M, Miller Christopher J, Simonson Steven G

机构信息

Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1480-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1480.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Acute asthma causes nearly 2 million hospital emergency department (ED) visits in the United States annually, and hospitalization after an ED visit and relapse after ED discharge are common.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the adding of therapy with zafirlukast to standardized care for patients with acute asthma in the ED and a 28-day follow-up period.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

A total of 641 patients presenting to the ED with acute asthma were randomized to receive either single-dose zafirlukast, 160 mg (Z160) [162 patients], zafirlukast, 20 mg (Z20) [158 patients]), or placebo (321 patients) as adjunct treatment to standard care in this double-blind, multicenter trial. Assessments, including spirometry and symptom scores, were obtained before each albuterol treatment and at 4 h. Patients who were discharged from the ED after 4 h continued outpatient therapy over a 28-day period and received either Z20 bid (276 patients) or placebo (270 patients) in addition to prednisone, albuterol, and their previous asthma medications. FEV(1) was measured at clinic visits on days 10 and 28. Patients recorded outpatient clinical data twice daily on a home diary card.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

the effect of zafirlukast on relapse after ED discharge. Other assessments were the rate of extended care (ie, ED stay for > 4 h or hospitalization), FEV(1), and symptoms.

RESULTS

At the end of the outpatient period, 65 of 276 patients (23.6%) treated with zafirlukast and 78 of 270 patients (28.9%) treated with placebo relapsed (p = 0.047; absolute reduction, 5.3%; relative reduction, 18.3%). At the end of the ED period, 16 of 162 patients (9.9%) treated with Z160, 26 of 158 patients (16.5%) treated with Z20, and 48 of 321 patients (15.0%) treated with placebo required extended care (p = 0.052; absolute reduction with Z160 compared to placebo, 5.1%; relative reduction, 34%). These findings were supported by a significant improvement in FEV(1) and dyspnea in the ED with the use of Z160 therapy, and by greater improvement in FEV(1) and symptoms during the outpatient period for patients treated with Z20.

CONCLUSIONS

When added to standardized care, therapy with Z20 bid reduced the risk of relapse compared with placebo over a 28-day treatment period. One dose of Z160 in the ED also reduced the rate of extended care.

摘要

背景

在美国,急性哮喘每年导致近200万人次前往医院急诊科就诊,并且在急诊科就诊后住院以及急诊科出院后复发的情况很常见。

目的

评估在急诊科对急性哮喘患者进行标准化治疗并随访28天期间加用扎鲁司特治疗的效果。

设计与患者

在这项双盲、多中心试验中,共有641例因急性哮喘前往急诊科就诊的患者被随机分为接受单剂量扎鲁司特160mg(Z160组,162例患者)、扎鲁司特20mg(Z20组,158例患者)或安慰剂(321例患者),作为标准治疗的辅助治疗。在每次使用沙丁胺醇治疗前及4小时时进行评估,包括肺功能测定和症状评分。4小时后从急诊科出院的患者在28天内继续接受门诊治疗,除泼尼松、沙丁胺醇及之前的哮喘用药外,还接受Z20每日两次治疗(276例患者)或安慰剂治疗(270例患者)。在第10天和第28天门诊就诊时测量第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)。患者每天两次在家用日记卡上记录门诊临床数据。

主要观察指标

扎鲁司特对急诊科出院后复发的影响。其他评估指标包括延长护理率(即急诊科停留时间>4小时或住院)、FEV₁和症状。

结果

在门诊治疗期结束时,接受扎鲁司特治疗的276例患者中有65例(23.6%)复发,接受安慰剂治疗的270例患者中有78例(28.9%)复发(p = 0.047;绝对降低率为5.3%;相对降低率为18.3%)。在急诊科治疗期结束时,接受Z160治疗的162例患者中有16例(9.9%)、接受Z20治疗的158例患者中有26例(16.5%)、接受安慰剂治疗的321例患者中有48例(15.0%)需要延长护理(p = 0.052;与安慰剂相比,Z160组的绝对降低率为5.1%;相对降低率为34%)。这些结果得到了以下支持:在急诊科使用Z160治疗时FEV₁和呼吸困难有显著改善,以及在门诊治疗期接受Z20治疗的患者FEV₁和症状有更大改善。

结论

在标准化治疗基础上加用Z20每日两次治疗,与安慰剂相比,在28天治疗期内降低了复发风险。在急诊科使用一剂Z160也降低了延长护理率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验