Viinikainen A, Göransson H, Huovinen K, Kellomäki M, Rokkanen P
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, FIN-00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland.
J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Dec;29(6):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.05.007.
Five core suture techniques were compared by static tensile testing in vitro. Fifty porcine tendons were used. The core sutures were performed with 3-0 or 4-0 braided polyester suture (Ticron) and the over-and-over running peripheral sutures with 6-0 monofilament polypropylene (Prolene). The core sutures were: (1) Pennington modified Kessler (3-0), (2) Double Pennington modified Kessler (3-0), (3) 4-strand Savage (3-0), (4) 4-strand Savage (4-0), and (5) 6-strand Savage (4-0). Repairs were compared as paired in regard to one variable: the number of core suture strands, the suture calibre, or the suture configuration. Biomechanical differences between the repair groups started during the linear region, with the yield force and stiffness increasing along with the number of core suture strands. All three variables influenced the strain at the yield point. Thus, the strength of the intact repair can be improved by modifying the core suture. In all repairs gap formation started near the yield point after failure of the peripheral suture. The yield force represents the strength of the intact repair composite and should be considered the strength of the tendon repair.
通过体外静态拉伸试验比较了五种核心缝合技术。使用了50根猪肌腱。核心缝合采用3-0或4-0编织聚酯缝线(Ticron),连续往返式周边缝合采用6-0单丝聚丙烯缝线(Prolene)。核心缝合方式包括:(1)彭宁顿改良凯斯勒缝合法(3-0),(2)双彭宁顿改良凯斯勒缝合法(3-0),(3)四股萨维奇缝合法(3-0),(4)四股萨维奇缝合法(4-0),以及(5)六股萨维奇缝合法(4-0)。根据一个变量对修复进行配对比较:核心缝合线的股数、缝线直径或缝线构型。修复组之间的生物力学差异始于线性区域,屈服力和刚度随着核心缝合线股数的增加而增加。所有三个变量都会影响屈服点处的应变。因此,通过改良核心缝合可以提高完整修复的强度。在所有修复中,周边缝线失效后,间隙形成始于屈服点附近。屈服力代表完整修复复合体的强度,应被视为肌腱修复的强度。