Suppr超能文献

前列腺调强放射治疗射束方向类解决方案的可行性研究

Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.

作者信息

Schreibmann Eduard, Xing Lei

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5847, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2004 Oct;31(10):2863-70. doi: 10.1118/1.1797571.

Abstract

IMRT is being increasingly used for treatment of prostate cancer. In practice, however, the beam orientations used for the treatments are still selected empirically, without any guideline. The purpose of this work was to investigate interpatient variation of the optimal beam configuration and to facilitate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) prostate treatment planning by proposing a set of beam orientation class-solutions for a range of numbers of incident beams. We used fifteen prostate cases to generate the beam orientation class-solutions. For each patient and a given number of incident beams, a multiobjective optimization engine was employed to provide optimal beam directions. For the fifteen cases considered, the gantry angle of any of the optimized plans were all distributed within a certain range The angular distributions of the optimal beams were analyzed and the most selected directions are identified as optimal directions. The optimal directions for all patients are averaged to obtain the class-solution. The class-solution gantry angles for prostate IMRT were found to be: three beams (0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees), five beams (35 degrees, 110 degrees, 180 degrees, 250 degrees, 325 degrees), six beams (0 degrees, 60 degrees, 120 degrees, 180 degrees, 240 degrees, 300 degrees), seven beams (25 degrees, 75 degrees, 130 degrees, 180 degrees, 230 degrees, 285 degrees, 335 degrees), eight beams (20 degrees, 70 degrees, 110 degrees, 150 degrees, 200 degrees, 250 degrees, 290 degrees, 340 degrees), and nine beams (20 degrees, 60 degrees, 100 degrees, 140 degrees, 180 degrees, 220 degrees, 260 degrees, 300 degrees, 340 degrees). The level of validity of the class-solutions was tested using an additional clinical prostate case by comparing with the individually optimized beam configurations. The difference between the plans obtained with class-solutions and patient-specific optimizations was found to be clinically insignificant.

摘要

调强放射治疗(IMRT)越来越多地用于前列腺癌的治疗。然而在实际应用中,用于治疗的射束方向仍凭经验选择,没有任何指导原则。本研究的目的是调查患者间最佳射束配置的差异,并通过针对一系列入射射束数量提出一组射束方向类别解决方案,来促进调强放射治疗(IMRT)前列腺治疗计划的制定。我们使用了15例前列腺病例来生成射束方向类别解决方案。对于每例患者和给定数量的入射射束,采用多目标优化引擎来提供最佳射束方向。对于所考虑的15例病例,任何优化计划的机架角度都分布在一定范围内。分析了最佳射束的角度分布,并将最常选择的方向确定为最佳方向。对所有患者的最佳方向进行平均以获得类别解决方案。发现前列腺IMRT的类别解决方案机架角度为:三射束(0度、120度、240度),五射束(35度、110度、180度、250度、325度),六射束(0度、60度、120度、180度、240度、300度),七射束(25度、75度、130度、180度、230度、285度、335度),八射束(20度、70度、110度、150度、200度、250度、290度、340度),以及九射束(20度、60度、100度、140度、180度、220度、260度、300度、340度)。通过与个体优化的射束配置进行比较,使用另外一个临床前列腺病例测试了类别解决方案的有效性水平。发现使用类别解决方案获得的计划与患者特异性优化之间的差异在临床上无显著意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验