Hartung J
Institut für Tierhygiene und Tierschutz, Tierärztlichen Hochschule Hannover.
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1992 Feb;192(5):389-418.
Agricultural animal production in increasingly regarded as a source of gases which are both aggravating and ecologically harmful. An overview of the origin, number and quantity of trace gases emitted from animal housing and from manure stores is presented and possible means of preventing or reducing them are discussed. Of the 136 trace gases in the air of animal houses, odorous substances, ammonia and methane are most relevant to the environment. The role played by the remaining gases is largely unknown. Quantitative information is available for 23 gases. The gases are emitted principally from freshly deposited and stored faeces, from animal feed and from the animals themselves. Future work should determine sources and quantities of the gases emitted from animal housing more precisely and should aim to investigate the potential of these gases to cause damage in man, animals and environment. Odorous substances have an effect on the area immediately surrounding the animal housing. They can lead to considerable aggravation in humans. For years, VDI1 guidelines (3471/72), which prescribe distances between residential buildings and animal housing, have been valuable in preventing odour problems of this kind. Coverings are suitable for outside stores. The intensity of the odour from animal housing waste air increases from cattle through to hens and pigs; it is also further affected by the type of housing, the age of the animals and the purpose for which they are being kept. Methods of cleaning waste air (scrubbers/biofilters) are available for problematic cases. The need for guidelines to limit emissions from individual outside manure stores (lagoons) is recognised. Total ammonia emissions from animal production in the Federal Republic of Germany (up to 1989) are estimated at approximately 300,000 to 600,000 t/year. There is a shortage of satisfactory and precise research on the extent of emissions, in particular on those from naturally ventilated housing. It is calculated that between 12 and 21 kg/ha of nitrogen a year enter the soil via the air, the average of which is higher than the average "critical loads" for most natural habitats. Ammonia has a direct effect on the trees in the area surrounding animal housing and is transported long distances through the air causing eutrophication and acidification of water and vegetation. This frequently results in changes in plant sociology. Reduction measures must begin with the housing and manure removal systems and with feeding and management.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
农业动物生产越来越被视为加剧气候变化且对生态有害的气体来源。本文概述了动物饲养舍和粪便储存场所排放的微量气体的来源、种类和数量,并讨论了预防或减少这些气体排放的可能方法。在动物饲养舍空气中的136种微量气体中,有气味物质、氨和甲烷与环境最为相关。其余气体所起的作用在很大程度上尚不清楚。目前可获取23种气体的定量信息。这些气体主要从新排放和储存的粪便、动物饲料以及动物自身排放。未来的工作应更精确地确定动物饲养舍排放气体的来源和数量,并应致力于研究这些气体对人类、动物和环境造成损害的可能性。有气味物质会对动物饲养舍周边区域产生影响,它们会给人类带来相当大的困扰。多年来,VDI1指南(3471/72)规定了住宅建筑与动物饲养舍之间的距离,在防止此类气味问题方面很有价值。遮盖物适用于室外储存场所。动物饲养舍废气的气味强度从牛舍到鸡舍再到猪舍逐渐增加;它还会受到饲养方式、动物年龄以及饲养目的的进一步影响。对于有问题的情况,有废气净化方法(洗涤器/生物过滤器)可用。人们认识到需要制定准则来限制各个室外粪便储存场所(泻湖)的排放。据估计,德意志联邦共和国(截至1989年)动物生产产生的氨排放总量约为每年30万至60万吨。关于排放程度,尤其是自然通风饲养舍的排放程度,缺乏令人满意且精确的研究。据计算,每年有12至21千克/公顷的氮通过空气进入土壤,这一平均值高于大多数自然栖息地的平均“临界负荷”。氨对动物饲养舍周边区域的树木有直接影响,并通过空气远距离传输,导致水体和植被的富营养化和酸化。这常常导致植物群落发生变化。减排措施必须从饲养舍和粪便清理系统以及饲养和管理入手。(摘要截选至400字)