Soil Quality Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1293-312. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12767. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Livestock manure contributes considerably to global emissions of ammonia (NH3 ) and greenhouse gases (GHG), especially methane (CH4 ) and nitrous oxide (N2 O). Various measures have been developed to mitigate these emissions, but most of these focus on one specific gas and/or emission source. Here, we present a meta-analysis and integrated assessment of the effects of mitigation measures on NH3 , CH4 and (direct and indirect) N2 O emissions from the whole manure management chain. We analysed the effects of mitigation technologies on NH3 , CH4 and N2 O emissions from individual sources statistically using results of 126 published studies. Whole-chain effects on NH3 and GHG emissions were assessed through scenario analysis. Significant NH3 reduction efficiencies were observed for (i) housing via lowering the dietary crude protein (CP) content (24-65%, compared to the reference situation), for (ii) external slurry storages via acidification (83%) and covers of straw (78%) or artificial films (98%), for (iii) solid manure storages via compaction and covering (61%, compared to composting), and for (iv) manure application through band spreading (55%, compared to surface application), incorporation (70%) and injection (80%). Acidification decreased CH4 emissions from stored slurry by 87%. Significant increases in N2 O emissions were found for straw-covered slurry storages (by two orders of magnitude) and manure injection (by 26-199%). These side-effects of straw covers and slurry injection on N2 O emission were relatively small when considering the total GHG emissions from the manure chain. Lowering the CP content of feed and acidifying slurry are strategies that consistently reduce NH3 and GHG emissions in the whole chain. Other strategies may reduce emissions of a specific gas or emissions source, by which there is a risk of unwanted trade-offs in the manure management chain. Proper farm-scale combinations of mitigation measures are important to minimize impacts of livestock production on global emissions of NH3 and GHG.
牲畜粪便对全球氨(NH3)和温室气体(GHG)排放,尤其是甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放有重要贡献。已经开发了各种措施来减轻这些排放,但大多数措施都集中在一种特定的气体和/或排放源上。在这里,我们对整个粪便管理链中减轻措施对 NH3、CH4 和(直接和间接)N2O 排放的影响进行了荟萃分析和综合评估。我们通过 126 项已发表研究的结果,从统计学上分析了减轻技术对单个来源的 NH3、CH4 和 N2O 排放的影响。通过情景分析评估了对 NH3 和 GHG 排放的整体影响。通过降低日粮粗蛋白(CP)含量(与参考情况相比,降低 24-65%),通过酸化(83%)、覆盖稻草(78%)或人工薄膜(98%)、通过压实和覆盖(与堆肥相比,降低 61%),以及通过带状施撒(与表面施撒相比,降低 55%)、掺入(70%)和注射(80%)来处理固体粪便储存,可以显著减少 NH3 排放量。酸化使储存的泥浆中的 CH4 排放量减少了 87%。稻草覆盖的泥浆储存和粪肥注射会导致 N2O 排放显著增加(增加两个数量级和增加 26-199%)。考虑到粪便链中的总 GHG 排放,稻草覆盖和泥浆注射对 N2O 排放的这些副作用相对较小。降低饲料中的 CP 含量和酸化泥浆是在整个链条中始终减少 NH3 和 GHG 排放的策略。其他策略可能会减少特定气体或排放源的排放,从而导致粪便管理链中出现不必要的权衡。在农场规模上适当组合减轻措施对于最大限度地减少牲畜生产对全球 NH3 和 GHG 排放的影响非常重要。