Suppr超能文献

针对女性癌症患者临床决策的教育与行为示范。

Education and role modelling for clinical decisions with female cancer patients.

作者信息

Brown Rhonda F, Butow Phyllis N, Sharrock Merin Anne, Henman Michael, Boyle Fran, Goldstein David, Tattersall Martin H N

机构信息

Medical Psychology Research Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):303-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00294.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients vary widely in their preferences and capacity for participating in treatment decision-making. There are few interventions targeting patient understanding of how doctors make decisions and shared decision-making. This randomized trial investigates the effects of providing cancer patients with a package designed to facilitate shared decision-making prior to seeing their oncologist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five female cancer patients were randomized to receive either the package (booklet and 15-min video) or a booklet on living with cancer, before their initial consultation. Participants completed questionnaires prior to the intervention, immediately after the oncology consultation, and 2 weeks and 6 months later. The first consultation with the oncologist was audio-taped and transcribed.

RESULTS

Patients receiving the package were more likely than controls to declare their information and treatment preferences in the consultation, and their perspectives on the costs, side-effects and benefits of treatment. Doctors introduced considerably more new themes in the consultations with intervention subjects than they did with controls; no other differences in doctor behaviour were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This short intervention successfully shifted patient and doctor behaviour closer to the shared decision-making model, although it did not alter patients' preferences for information or involvement.

摘要

背景

患者在参与治疗决策的偏好和能力方面差异很大。针对患者理解医生如何做出决策以及共同决策的干预措施很少。这项随机试验调查了在癌症患者看肿瘤医生之前,为他们提供一套旨在促进共同决策的资料的效果。

患者与方法

65名女性癌症患者在首次咨询前被随机分为两组,一组接受该套资料(小册子和15分钟视频),另一组接受一本关于患癌生活的小册子。参与者在干预前、肿瘤咨询后立即、以及2周和6个月后完成问卷调查。与肿瘤医生的首次咨询进行了录音和转录。

结果

与对照组相比,接受该套资料的患者在咨询中更有可能表明自己的信息和治疗偏好,以及他们对治疗成本、副作用和益处的看法。与对照组相比,医生在与干预组患者的咨询中引入了更多新的主题;未发现医生行为的其他差异。

结论

这项简短的干预成功地使患者和医生的行为更接近共同决策模式,尽管它没有改变患者对信息或参与度的偏好。

相似文献

4
Sharing decisions in cancer care.癌症护理中的共同决策。
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1865-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00303-8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Manufactured but not imported: new directions for research in shared decision making support and skills.
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00077-6.
5
Lay constructions of decision-making in cancer.
Psychooncology. 2002 Jul-Aug;11(4):295-306. doi: 10.1002/pon.566.
10
Evidence-based medicine: useful tools for decision making.循证医学:决策的有用工具。
Med J Aust. 2001 Mar 5;174(5):248-53. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143250.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验