Brown Rhonda F, Butow Phyllis N, Sharrock Merin Anne, Henman Michael, Boyle Fran, Goldstein David, Tattersall Martin H N
Medical Psychology Research Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):303-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00294.x.
Patients vary widely in their preferences and capacity for participating in treatment decision-making. There are few interventions targeting patient understanding of how doctors make decisions and shared decision-making. This randomized trial investigates the effects of providing cancer patients with a package designed to facilitate shared decision-making prior to seeing their oncologist.
Sixty-five female cancer patients were randomized to receive either the package (booklet and 15-min video) or a booklet on living with cancer, before their initial consultation. Participants completed questionnaires prior to the intervention, immediately after the oncology consultation, and 2 weeks and 6 months later. The first consultation with the oncologist was audio-taped and transcribed.
Patients receiving the package were more likely than controls to declare their information and treatment preferences in the consultation, and their perspectives on the costs, side-effects and benefits of treatment. Doctors introduced considerably more new themes in the consultations with intervention subjects than they did with controls; no other differences in doctor behaviour were noted.
This short intervention successfully shifted patient and doctor behaviour closer to the shared decision-making model, although it did not alter patients' preferences for information or involvement.
患者在参与治疗决策的偏好和能力方面差异很大。针对患者理解医生如何做出决策以及共同决策的干预措施很少。这项随机试验调查了在癌症患者看肿瘤医生之前,为他们提供一套旨在促进共同决策的资料的效果。
65名女性癌症患者在首次咨询前被随机分为两组,一组接受该套资料(小册子和15分钟视频),另一组接受一本关于患癌生活的小册子。参与者在干预前、肿瘤咨询后立即、以及2周和6个月后完成问卷调查。与肿瘤医生的首次咨询进行了录音和转录。
与对照组相比,接受该套资料的患者在咨询中更有可能表明自己的信息和治疗偏好,以及他们对治疗成本、副作用和益处的看法。与对照组相比,医生在与干预组患者的咨询中引入了更多新的主题;未发现医生行为的其他差异。
这项简短的干预成功地使患者和医生的行为更接近共同决策模式,尽管它没有改变患者对信息或参与度的偏好。