• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烹饪课程对大二学生的效果优于烹饪示范。

Cooking classes outperform cooking demonstrations for college sophomores.

作者信息

Levy Joshua, Auld Garry

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Jul-Aug;36(4):197-203. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60234-0.

DOI:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60234-0
PMID:15544728
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if cooking classes improve subjects' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward cooking.

DESIGN

Comparison of outcomes of 2 treatment groups (demonstration vs hands-on cooking classes) using pre- and posttests.

SETTING

University cooking laboratories.

PARTICIPANTS

First-semester sophomores (n = 65) who were 25% male with a mean age of 19.7 years.

INTERVENTION

The intervention group (n = 33) attended 4 2-hour cooking classes, based on Social Learning Theory, and a supermarket tour. The demonstration group (n = 32) attended a cooking demonstration. Subjects completed 6 surveys.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors regarding cooking.

ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic variables. Analysis of covariance and chi-square analyses were used to compare outcome variables.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed no gender differences. Participants displayed positive shifts on attitude scales. The intervention group had a pattern of larger positive shifts (0.4-0.7 vs 0.1-0.5 gain), some of which were statistically significant. Participants displayed positive, but not statistically significant, shifts in knowledge and some behaviors.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The intervention group experienced more statistically significant gains in attitudes and appeared to have a better pattern of gains in cooking-related knowledge and behaviors. Given limited resources, demonstration cooking classes could reach larger audiences in varied settings, but the impact would likely be weaker than that of cooking classes.

摘要

目的

确定烹饪课程是否能改善受试者对烹饪的知识、态度和行为。

设计

使用前测和后测对两个治疗组(示范烹饪课程与实践烹饪课程)的结果进行比较。

地点

大学烹饪实验室。

参与者

第一学期的大二学生(n = 65),其中25%为男性,平均年龄19.7岁。

干预措施

干预组(n = 33)参加了基于社会学习理论的4节两小时烹饪课程以及一次超市参观。示范组(n = 32)参加了一次烹饪示范。受试者完成了6项调查。

主要观察指标

与烹饪相关的态度、知识和行为的变化。

分析

使用描述性统计来比较人口统计学变量。使用协方差分析和卡方分析来比较结果变量。

结果

分析显示无性别差异。参与者在态度量表上呈现积极变化。干预组有更大的积极变化模式(增益为0.4 - 0.7对0.1 - 0.5),其中一些具有统计学意义。参与者在知识和一些行为方面呈现积极但无统计学意义的变化。

结论与启示

干预组在态度方面有更多具有统计学意义的增益,并且在与烹饪相关的知识和行为方面似乎有更好的增益模式。鉴于资源有限,示范烹饪课程可以在不同环境中覆盖更多受众,但影响可能比烹饪课程弱。

相似文献

1
Cooking classes outperform cooking demonstrations for college sophomores.烹饪课程对大二学生的效果优于烹饪示范。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Jul-Aug;36(4):197-203. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60234-0.
2
Good Grubbin': impact of a TV cooking show for college students living off campus.美味烹饪:一档电视烹饪节目对校外大学生的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009 May-Jun;41(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.01.006.
3
Nutrition and Culinary in the Kitchen Program: a randomized controlled intervention to promote cooking skills and healthy eating in university students - study protocol.营养与烹饪课程计划:一项促进大学生烹饪技能和健康饮食的随机对照干预研究——研究方案。
Nutr J. 2017 Dec 20;16(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0305-y.
4
Efficacy of Nutrition Education-Based Cooking Workshops in Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 50 Years and Older.基于营养教育的烹饪工作坊对50岁及以上社区居住成年人的疗效。
J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;34(4):369-87. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2015.1084257.
5
Positive impact of a cooking skills intervention among Brazilian university students: Six months follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.烹饪技能干预对巴西大学生的积极影响:一项随机对照试验的六个月随访。
Appetite. 2018 Nov 1;130:247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
6
Massive open online nutrition and cooking course for improved eating behaviors and meal composition.大规模在线营养与烹饪公开课程,以改善饮食行为和膳食构成。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 3;12:143. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0305-2.
7
Cooking Matters for Adults Improves Food Resource Management Skills and Self-confidence Among Low-Income Participants.“成人烹饪要事”项目提升了低收入参与者的食物资源管理技能和自信心。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jul-Aug;49(7):545-553.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.04.008.
8
Impact of a school-based cooking curriculum for fourth-grade students on attitudes and behaviors is influenced by gender and prior cooking experience.基于学校的烹饪课程对四年级学生的态度和行为的影响受到性别和之前烹饪经验的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Mar-Apr;46(2):110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
Nutrition students improve attitudes after a guided experiential assignment with older adults.营养专业的学生在与老年人进行一次有指导的体验式作业后,态度有所改善。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008 Sep-Oct;40(5):279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.09.011.
10
Influence of Cooking Workshops on Cooking Skills and Knowledge among Children Attending Summer Day Camps.夏令营儿童烹饪工作坊对烹饪技能和知识的影响。
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2020 Jun 1;81(2):86-90. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2019-030. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of nutrition class with cooking lab on college students' eating behaviors and well-being in the United States: a mixed-methods study.美国烹饪实验室营养课程对大学生饮食行为和幸福感的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nutr Res Pract. 2025 Apr;19(2):305-317. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2025.19.2.305. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Use of Interactive Food Labels to Increase Confidence in Preparing Produce among College Students.使用互动式食品标签提高大学生准备农产品的信心。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 1;16(15):2507. doi: 10.3390/nu16152507.
3
Impact of a Food Skills Course with a Teaching Kitchen on Dietary and Cooking Self-Efficacy and Behaviors among College Students.
带教学厨房的食品技能课程对大学生饮食和烹饪自我效能感及行为的影响。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 21;16(5):585. doi: 10.3390/nu16050585.
4
University Students as Change Agents for Health and Sustainability: A Pilot Study on the Effects of a Teaching Kitchen-Based Planetary Health Diet Curriculum.大学生作为健康和可持续发展的推动者:基于教学厨房的行星健康饮食课程对学生的影响的试点研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 13;16(4):521. doi: 10.3390/nu16040521.
5
New measures to assess the "Other" three pillars of food security-availability, utilization, and stability.评估粮食安全的“其他”三个支柱——供应、利用和稳定性的新措施。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Apr 26;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01451-z.
6
Participatory cooking demonstrations: A distinctive learning approach towards positive health.参与式烹饪示范:一种促进健康的独特学习方法。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Nov;11(11):7101-7105. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_998_22. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Assessing the Use of Social Cognitive Theory Components in Cooking and Food Skills Interventions.评估社会认知理论成分在烹饪和食品技能干预中的应用。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 4;15(5):1287. doi: 10.3390/nu15051287.
8
Trends in the Number of Behavioural Theory-Based Healthy Eating Interventions Inclusive of Dietitians/Nutritionists in 2000-2020.2000-2020 年包含营养师/营养学家的基于行为理论的健康饮食干预数量的变化趋势。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 20;13(11):4161. doi: 10.3390/nu13114161.
9
Beyond Ramen: Investigating Methods to Improve Food Agency among College Students.超越拉面:研究提高大学生食品代理能力的方法。
Nutrients. 2021 May 14;13(5):1674. doi: 10.3390/nu13051674.
10
Well-Being and Cooking Behavior: Using the Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA) Model as a Theoretical Framework.幸福感与烹饪行为:以积极情绪、投入、人际关系、意义和成就(PERMA)模型为理论框架
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:560578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.560578. eCollection 2021.