Suppr超能文献

烹饪课程对大二学生的效果优于烹饪示范。

Cooking classes outperform cooking demonstrations for college sophomores.

作者信息

Levy Joshua, Auld Garry

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Jul-Aug;36(4):197-203. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60234-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if cooking classes improve subjects' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward cooking.

DESIGN

Comparison of outcomes of 2 treatment groups (demonstration vs hands-on cooking classes) using pre- and posttests.

SETTING

University cooking laboratories.

PARTICIPANTS

First-semester sophomores (n = 65) who were 25% male with a mean age of 19.7 years.

INTERVENTION

The intervention group (n = 33) attended 4 2-hour cooking classes, based on Social Learning Theory, and a supermarket tour. The demonstration group (n = 32) attended a cooking demonstration. Subjects completed 6 surveys.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors regarding cooking.

ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic variables. Analysis of covariance and chi-square analyses were used to compare outcome variables.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed no gender differences. Participants displayed positive shifts on attitude scales. The intervention group had a pattern of larger positive shifts (0.4-0.7 vs 0.1-0.5 gain), some of which were statistically significant. Participants displayed positive, but not statistically significant, shifts in knowledge and some behaviors.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The intervention group experienced more statistically significant gains in attitudes and appeared to have a better pattern of gains in cooking-related knowledge and behaviors. Given limited resources, demonstration cooking classes could reach larger audiences in varied settings, but the impact would likely be weaker than that of cooking classes.

摘要

目的

确定烹饪课程是否能改善受试者对烹饪的知识、态度和行为。

设计

使用前测和后测对两个治疗组(示范烹饪课程与实践烹饪课程)的结果进行比较。

地点

大学烹饪实验室。

参与者

第一学期的大二学生(n = 65),其中25%为男性,平均年龄19.7岁。

干预措施

干预组(n = 33)参加了基于社会学习理论的4节两小时烹饪课程以及一次超市参观。示范组(n = 32)参加了一次烹饪示范。受试者完成了6项调查。

主要观察指标

与烹饪相关的态度、知识和行为的变化。

分析

使用描述性统计来比较人口统计学变量。使用协方差分析和卡方分析来比较结果变量。

结果

分析显示无性别差异。参与者在态度量表上呈现积极变化。干预组有更大的积极变化模式(增益为0.4 - 0.7对0.1 - 0.5),其中一些具有统计学意义。参与者在知识和一些行为方面呈现积极但无统计学意义的变化。

结论与启示

干预组在态度方面有更多具有统计学意义的增益,并且在与烹饪相关的知识和行为方面似乎有更好的增益模式。鉴于资源有限,示范烹饪课程可以在不同环境中覆盖更多受众,但影响可能比烹饪课程弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验