• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平控释片与利尿剂治疗单纯收缩期高血压的效果——INSIGHT研究的一项亚组分析

Effects of nifedipine GITS and diuretics in isolated systolic hypertension--a subanalysis of the INSIGHT study.

作者信息

Mancia Guiseppe, Ruilope Luis, Palmer Christopher, Brown Morris, Castaigne Alain, De Leeuw Peter, Rosental Talma, Wagener Gilbert

机构信息

University of Milano-Bicocca ,St Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2004;13(5):310-5. doi: 10.1080/08037050410022954.

DOI:10.1080/08037050410022954
PMID:15545155
Abstract

AIMS

This study tested the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of treatments based on nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) compared with the diuretic combination co-amilozide in a pre-specified subset of patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) enrolled in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) study.

MAJOR FINDINGS

Of 6321 randomized patients, 1498 (23.7%) had ISH with a baseline mean BP of 173/88 mmHg in both treatment groups. Mean BP fell by 29/10 mmHg in the nifedipine and 30/10 mmHg in the diuretic group to a mean BP of 144/78 mmHg and 143/79 mmHg, respectively, at endpoint. The percentage of primary outcomes in patients with ISH was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (nifedipine GITS 6.0%, co-amilozide 6.6%). The number of ISH patients with composite secondary outcomes was 90 (12.2%) in the nifedipine GITS group and 110 (14.5%) in the co-amilozide group (not significant). The incidence rates of primary and secondary outcomes were similar in patients without ISH.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ISH, nifedipine GITS and co-amilozide had similar effects on clinical outcomes and BP lowering. They lend support to international guidelines for the treatment of hypertension recommending the use of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as one treatment option for patients with ISH.

摘要

目的

在国际硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)研究:高血压治疗目标干预(INSIGHT)研究中预先指定的单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)患者亚组中,比较基于硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)的治疗与利尿剂复方阿米洛利对心血管结局的影响。

主要发现

在6321例随机分组的患者中,1498例(23.7%)患有ISH,两个治疗组的基线平均血压均为173/88 mmHg。在终点时,硝苯地平组平均血压下降29/10 mmHg,利尿剂组下降30/10 mmHg,分别降至平均血压144/78 mmHg和143/79 mmHg。两个治疗组中ISH患者的主要结局百分比无显著差异(硝苯地平GITS为6.0%,复方阿米洛利为6.6%)。硝苯地平GITS组有复合次要结局的ISH患者数量为90例(12.2%),复方阿米洛利组为110例(14.5%)(无显著差异)。无ISH患者的主要和次要结局发生率相似。

结论

在ISH患者中,硝苯地平GITS和复方阿米洛利对临床结局和血压降低的作用相似。它们支持高血压治疗的国际指南,推荐使用长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂作为ISH患者的一种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Effects of nifedipine GITS and diuretics in isolated systolic hypertension--a subanalysis of the INSIGHT study.硝苯地平控释片与利尿剂治疗单纯收缩期高血压的效果——INSIGHT研究的一项亚组分析
Blood Press. 2004;13(5):310-5. doi: 10.1080/08037050410022954.
2
Study population and treatment titration in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).国际硝苯地平控释片研究:高血压治疗目标干预(INSIGHT)中的研究人群与治疗滴定
J Hypertens. 1998 Dec;16(12 Pt 2):2113-6.
3
Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).国际硝苯地平控释片研究(INSIGHT):长效钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂双盲治疗患者的发病率和死亡率——高血压治疗以干预为目标
Lancet. 2000 Jul 29;356(9227):366-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02527-7.
4
Outcomes with nifedipine GITS or Co-amilozide in hypertensive diabetics and nondiabetics in Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension (INSIGHT).硝苯地平控释片或复方阿米洛利在高血压合并糖尿病及非糖尿病患者中以干预为目标的高血压治疗研究(INSIGHT)中的疗效。
Hypertension. 2003 Mar;41(3):431-6. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000057420.27692.AD. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
5
INSIGHT: international nifedipine GITS study intervention as a goal in hypertension treatment.洞察:国际硝苯地平控释片研究干预作为高血压治疗的一个目标
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10 Suppl 3:S157-60.
6
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
7
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
8
Blood pressure control by the nifedipine GITS-telmisartan combination in patients at high cardiovascular risk: the TALENT study.硝苯地平控释片-替米沙坦复方制剂在心血管高危患者中的降压作用:TALENT 研究。
J Hypertens. 2011 Mar;29(3):600-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342ef04.
9
Comparison of nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of elderly patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氢氯噻嗪治疗老年Ⅰ-Ⅲ期舒张期高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jun;9(6):598-606. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00168-9.
10
Effects of a fixed-dose ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial properties in isolated systolic hypertension.固定剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂-利尿剂联合用药对单纯收缩期高血压患者动态血压及动脉特性的影响
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;51(6):590-5. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31817a8316.

引用本文的文献

1
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.一线利尿剂与其他类别降压药治疗高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 13;7(7):CD008161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008161.pub3.
2
Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂治疗高血压的效果比较。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 11;2022:3739463. doi: 10.1155/2022/3739463. eCollection 2022.
3
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of the hypertensive patient.长效硝苯地平在高血压患者管理中的应用
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(6):1249-57. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s3661.
4
Optimal drug treatment of systolic hypertension in the elderly.老年人收缩期高血压的最佳药物治疗
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825010-00001.
5
Modified-release nifedipine: a review of the use of modified-release formulations in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris.缓释硝苯地平:关于缓释制剂在高血压和心绞痛治疗中应用的综述
Drugs. 2006;66(4):497-528. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666040-00007.