Russell Janet S, Martin Lucy, Curtin Dara, Penhale Sara, Trueblood Nathan A
Department of Biology, Earlham College, 801 National Road, Richmond, IN 47374, USA.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2004 Dec;28(1-4):188-94. doi: 10.1152/advan.00029.2003.
When faced with a diagnosis, it is empowering to be able to assess the evidence of treatment effectiveness and safety. To teach this skill to non-science majors, we assigned the "Responsible Patienthood Project" (RPP). For the RPP, students studied an array of disease and treatment literature: the final product of their work was a poster presentation, in which they did an in-depth analysis of one primary article, thus encouraging critical evaluation of experimental design, methods, and conclusions. Post-RPP, there was a 35% decrease in the student perception that they would unquestioningly accept a recommended treatment for a hypothetical diagnosis, and a 40% increase in the perception that they would consult a combination of resources, including primary articles. We recommend this project based on our results that suggest 1) non-science majors are able to successfully access and assess primary scientific literature, 2) students felt empowered by the RPP, and 3) skills in information gathering, via library instruction, may serve as a particularly helpful lifelong learning tool.
面对诊断结果时,若能评估治疗效果和安全性的证据,会让人更有掌控感。为了向非理科专业学生传授这项技能,我们布置了“责任患者项目”(RPP)。在这个项目中,学生们研究了一系列疾病和治疗文献:他们的最终成果是一份海报展示,在其中他们对一篇主要文章进行了深入分析,从而鼓励对实验设计、方法和结论进行批判性评估。在参与RPP项目之后,学生们认为自己会毫无质疑地接受针对假设诊断的推荐治疗的比例下降了35%,而认为自己会参考包括主要文章在内的多种资源的比例上升了40%。基于我们的结果,我们推荐这个项目,这些结果表明:1)非理科专业学生能够成功获取和评估主要科学文献;2)学生们从RPP项目中获得了力量;3)通过图书馆指导所学到的信息收集技能可能会成为特别有用的终身学习工具。