Suppr超能文献

低渗对比剂与高渗对比剂

Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material.

作者信息

Korn W T, Bettmann M A

机构信息

Boston University Hospital, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Curr Opin Radiol. 1992 Apr;4(2):9-15.

PMID:1554592
Abstract

Universal use of low-osmolality contrast agents for intravascular diagnostic procedures has been limited to a large extent by the high cost of these agents, which is generally 10 to 20 times that of high-osmolality contrast media. The question for the radiologist, therefore, is the definition of selected populations and situations for the use of low-osmolality agents to achieve the greatest patient benefit at the least cost. The authors examine controversial issues including the incidence of significant contrast reactions, the definition and incidence of nephrotoxicity, and the effects of contrast media on coagulability.

摘要

低渗性造影剂在血管内诊断程序中的广泛应用在很大程度上受到这些造影剂高成本的限制,其成本通常是高渗性造影剂的10至20倍。因此,放射科医生面临的问题是确定使用低渗性造影剂的特定人群和情况,以便以最低成本实现最大的患者受益。作者研究了一些有争议的问题,包括严重造影剂反应的发生率、肾毒性的定义和发生率,以及造影剂对凝血性的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验