• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣手术的当代趋势:单中心10年临床经验

Contemporary trends in aortic valve surgery: a single centre 10-year clinical experience.

作者信息

Hanayama Naoji, Fazel Shafie, Goldman Bernard S, Mitoff Peter R, Sever Jeri, Fremes Stephen E

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04096.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04096.x
PMID:15548192
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a comprehensive profile of the trends in aortic valve replacement at a single institution over the past decade. Prospectively collected data concerning 873 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), with and without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), were analysed. The patients were divided into three time periods: period I, (1990 to 1993); period II, (1994 to 1996); and period III, (1997 to 2000). Actuarial survival of AVR patients with and without CABG at 7 years was 82.9 +/- 2.4% and 79.1 +/- 3.3% (p = 0.17), respectively. Actuarial survival at 7 years for stentless, mechanical, and stented valve patients were 89.5 +/- 2.7%, 85.5 +/- 2.8%, and 76.0 +/- 3.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between the stentless and stented valve groups (p = 0.014). Age (63.8 +/- 12.9 yrs, 66.2 +/- 11.0 yrs, 67.9 +/- 10.3 yrs; p = 0.01), the incidence of peripheral vascular disease (5.1%, 10.8%, 16.6%; p = 0.001), and the extent of coronary artery disease necessitating CABG (34.0%, 38.8%, 41.0%; p = 0.05) have increased significantly in the later time period. However, operative mortality has remained constant (4.7%, 4.8%, 4.5%; p = 0.9). Moreover, perioperative complications have decreased significantly (27.4%, 18.0, 16.0%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified more recent time period as independent protective factor for early mortality and morbidity (period I, RR 1.00; period II, RR 0.47; period III, RR 0.40).

摘要

本研究的目的是呈现过去十年间某单一机构主动脉瓣置换术趋势的全面概况。对前瞻性收集的873例行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)患者的数据进行了分析,这些患者有的还进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),有的没有。患者被分为三个时间段:第一阶段(1990年至1993年);第二阶段(1994年至1996年);第三阶段(1997年至2000年)。行AVR且未行CABG患者以及行AVR并行CABG患者7年的精算生存率分别为82.9±2.4%和79.1±3.3%(p = 0.17)。无支架瓣膜、机械瓣膜和有支架瓣膜患者7年的精算生存率分别为89.5±2.7%、85.5±2.8%和76.0±3.2%。无支架瓣膜组和有支架瓣膜组的生存率存在显著差异(p = 0.014)。后期年龄段(63.8±12.9岁、66.2±11.0岁、67.9±10.3岁;p = 0.01)、外周血管疾病发生率(5.1%、10.8%、16.6%;p = 0.001)以及需要行CABG的冠状动脉疾病程度(34.0%、38.8%、41.0%;p = 0.05)均显著增加。然而,手术死亡率保持不变(4.7%、4.8%、4.5%;p = 0.9)。此外,围手术期并发症显著减少(27.4%、18.0%、16.0%;p = 0.001)。多变量分析确定较近时间段是早期死亡率和发病率的独立保护因素(第一阶段,RR 1.00;第二阶段,RR 0.47;第三阶段,RR 0.40)。

相似文献

1
Contemporary trends in aortic valve surgery: a single centre 10-year clinical experience.主动脉瓣手术的当代趋势:单中心10年临床经验
J Card Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04096.x.
2
Risk factors and survival after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.八旬老人主动脉瓣置换术后的危险因素与生存情况
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Jul;13(4):538-44.
3
Results of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the VA population.退伍军人事务部人群中同期主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jan;15(1):12-8; discussion 18-9.
4
Is routine use of stentless aortic prostheses justified in an elderly (aged > or =75 years) population?在老年人群(年龄≥75岁)中常规使用无支架主动脉假体是否合理?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Jan;14(1):64-70; discussion 70-1.
5
Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality.八旬老人主动脉瓣置换术:早期和晚期死亡的危险因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 May;83(5):1651-6; discussion 1656-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.068.
6
Does the use of a stentless bioprosthesis increase surgical risk?使用无支架生物假体是否会增加手术风险?
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Oct;13(4 Suppl 1):143-7.
7
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis after previous coronary artery bypass grafting: could early reoperation be prevented?既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后主动脉瓣置换治疗主动脉瓣狭窄:能否预防早期再次手术?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jul;15(4):474-8.
8
Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts.主动脉瓣置换术与同期冠状动脉搭桥术:评估多支移植血管的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):969-78. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.027.
9
Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: 10-year experience.主动脉瓣置换术治疗既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者:10 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Mar;41(3):e1-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr212. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
10
The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.无支架自由式生物假体:80岁以上患者年龄对生活质量、围手术期及中期结果的影响。
J Card Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00249.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in mechanical aortic valve replacement surgery in a large, multi-surgeon, single hospital practice.大型单医院多外科医生实施机械主动脉瓣置换手术的趋势
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Dec;11(4):367-72. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.47334. Epub 2014 Nov 30.