• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后主动脉瓣置换治疗主动脉瓣狭窄:能否预防早期再次手术?

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis after previous coronary artery bypass grafting: could early reoperation be prevented?

作者信息

Verhoye Jean Ph, Merlicco Franceseca, Sami Ibrahim M, Cappabianca Giangiuseppe, Lecouls Hervé, Corbineau Hervé, Langanay Thierry, Leguerrier Alain

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ponchaillou, Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jul;15(4):474-8.

PMID:16901038
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The study aim was to examine, retrospectively, the risk of accelerated progression of aortic stenosis (AS) and outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients who had undergone previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2004, 81 patients with mild-to-moderate AS at the time of CABG underwent subsequent AVR. The mean EuroScore was 10.8 +/- 1.8. The population was divided into three subgroups according to the time interval between AVR and CABG: group A, < 5 years (n = 23); group B, 5-10 years (n = 34); and group C, > 10 years (n = 24).

RESULTS

Mean age at the time of CABG was 70 +/- 5, 64 +/- 6 and 58 +/- 5 years in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The peak transvalvular gradient was < or = 30 mmHg in 65 patients (80.2%), and 30-50 mmHg in 16 (19.7%). Operative mortality after AVR was 16% in the overall population (30%, 11.7%, and 8.6% in groups A, B, and C, respectively). The mean time interval between CABG and AVR was 8.9 +/- 5.2 years. By multivariate analysis, a peak transvalvular gradient > or = 30 mmHg (p = 0.003), moderate calcifications with moderately-to-severely limited valve motion (p = 0.05), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (p = 0.005) were independent predictors of AVR within five years of CABG surgery. Systemic vascular atherosclerotic disease was a predictor of rapid disease progression by univariate analysis, and a predictor of operative mortality by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Because of the high mortality associated with repeat operations within five years, AVR should be considered at the time of CABG in patients aged < or = 75 years, with a peak transvalvular gradient > 30 mmHg, moderately prominent calcifications with moderately to severely limited valve motion, and LVH.

摘要

研究背景与目的

本研究旨在回顾性分析既往接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者发生主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)加速进展的风险以及主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后的结局。

方法

1994年至2004年间,81例在CABG时患有轻至中度AS的患者随后接受了AVR。平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroScore)评分为10.8±1.8。根据AVR与CABG之间的时间间隔,将患者分为三个亚组:A组,间隔<5年(n = 23);B组,间隔5 - 10年(n = 34);C组,间隔>10年(n = 24)。

结果

CABG时A组、B组和C组的平均年龄分别为70±5岁、64±6岁和58±5岁。65例患者(80.2%)的跨瓣压差峰值≤30 mmHg,16例患者(19.7%)的跨瓣压差峰值为30 - 50 mmHg。AVR术后总体人群的手术死亡率为16%(A组、B组和C组分别为30%、11.7%和8.6%)。CABG与AVR之间的平均时间间隔为8.9±5.2年。多因素分析显示,跨瓣压差峰值≥30 mmHg(p = 0.003)、中度钙化伴中度至重度瓣膜活动受限(p = 0.05)以及左心室肥厚(LVH)(p = 0.005)是CABG术后五年内进行AVR的独立预测因素。全身血管动脉粥样硬化疾病在单因素分析中是疾病快速进展的预测因素,在多因素分析中是手术死亡率的预测因素。

结论

由于五年内再次手术相关的高死亡率,对于年龄≤75岁、跨瓣压差峰值>30 mmHg、中度明显钙化伴中度至重度瓣膜活动受限以及LVH的患者,应在CABG时考虑进行AVR。

相似文献

1
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis after previous coronary artery bypass grafting: could early reoperation be prevented?既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后主动脉瓣置换治疗主动脉瓣狭窄:能否预防早期再次手术?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jul;15(4):474-8.
2
Should coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergo concomitant aortic valve replacement? A decision analysis approach to the surgical dilemma.患有轻度或中度主动脉瓣狭窄的冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者是否应同时进行主动脉瓣置换术?手术困境的决策分析方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.031.
3
Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后的主动脉瓣置换术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1424-30. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00635-2.
4
Management of mild aortic stenosis at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery: should the valve be replaced?冠状动脉搭桥手术时轻度主动脉瓣狭窄的处理:瓣膜是否应置换?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;88(4):1224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.085.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk.在健康的八旬老人中,冠状动脉搭桥术联合主动脉瓣置换术不会增加术后风险。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002 Sep;36(5):297-301. doi: 10.1080/140174302320774519.
6
Moderate aortic stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafting patients more than 70 years of age: to replace or not to replace?70 岁以上冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的中度主动脉瓣狭窄:换瓣还是不换瓣?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1495-9; discussion 1499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.036.
7
Safety of remote aortic valve replacement after prior coronary artery bypass grafting.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后行远程主动脉瓣置换术的安全性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jun;61(6):1689-91; discussion 1691-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00165-8.
8
Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts.主动脉瓣置换术与同期冠状动脉搭桥术:评估多支移植血管的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):969-78. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.027.
9
Management of asymptomatic mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery operations.冠状动脉手术期间无症状轻度主动脉瓣狭窄的管理。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jun;61(6):1693-7; discussion 1697-8. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00196-8.
10
Management of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with mild to moderate aortic stenosis.患有轻度至中度主动脉瓣狭窄的冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者的管理
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 May;13(3):369-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Current Evidence and Challenges Ahead.中度主动脉瓣狭窄与左心室射血分数降低:当前证据与面临的挑战
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Aug 17;5:111. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00111. eCollection 2018.
2
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.既往心脏手术后经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiol Res Pract. 2018 Apr 5;2018:4615043. doi: 10.1155/2018/4615043. eCollection 2018.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI): a review.
经导管主动脉瓣插入术(TAVI):综述。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Jan;87(1033):20130595. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130595. Epub 2013 Nov 20.