Nygren Marianne
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
J Pers Assess. 2004 Dec;83(3):277-92. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8303_10.
Few studies have concerned the relation between Comprehensive System (CS; Exner, 1991, 1993, 2003) Rorschach variables, and suitability for psychodynamic psychotherapy. In this study, I predicted correlations between 17 rationally selected CS variables and suitability for psychotherapy as represented by ratings of Dynamic Capacity and Ego Strength. The participants were 52 psychotherapy applicants between 20 and 57 years old. The ratings were performed after clinical interviews and decisions concerning selection of the applicants. EA, FC, Blends, Zf, and MQo correlated positively and YFY negatively with Dynamic Capacity ratings, whereas EA, FC, and Blends correlated positively and YFY and F% negatively with Ego Strength ratings. EA, FC, YFY, Zf, MQo, and F% also differed between the applicants selected and those not selected for psychotherapy. Considering earlier research, the results for Blends, Zf, and F% were interpreted as replications and for MQo and EA as showing satisfactory consistency.
很少有研究关注综合系统（CS；Exner，1991年、1993年、2003年）罗夏测验变量与心理动力心理治疗适宜性之间的关系。在本研究中，我预测了17个合理选择的CS变量与以动力能力和自我力量评分表示的心理治疗适宜性之间的相关性。参与者为52名年龄在20至57岁之间的心理治疗申请者。评分在临床访谈以及关于申请者选择的决定之后进行。EA、FC、融合分数、Zf和MQo与动力能力评分呈正相关，而YFY与之呈负相关；EA、FC和融合分数与自我力量评分呈正相关，而YFY和F%与之呈负相关。EA、FC、YFY、Zf、MQo和F%在被选入心理治疗的申请者和未被选入的申请者之间也存在差异。考虑到早期研究，融合分数、Zf和F%的结果被解释为重复，MQo和EA的结果显示出令人满意的一致性。
