Koval Michael J, Ford Kristen A, Everling Stefan
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Nov;159(2):268-72. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2104-x. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
Subjects sometimes fail to suppress a reflexive saccade towards the flashed stimulus in an anti-saccade task. Here, we studied how error rates in the anti-saccade task varied as a function of saccadic probability. Ten subjects performed 200 anti-saccade trials for each of three saccade-direction probability conditions (20%, 50%, and 80%). We found that as the likelihood of a saccade in a given direction increased, the percentage of pro-saccade errors also increased for stimulus presentations in this direction. These results provide support for the hypothesis that errors in the anti-saccade task are the result of an increased level of motor preparation.
在一项反扫视任务中,受试者有时无法抑制对闪光刺激的反射性扫视。在此,我们研究了反扫视任务中的错误率如何随扫视概率而变化。10名受试者在三种扫视方向概率条件(20%、50%和80%)下,每种条件都进行了200次反扫视试验。我们发现,随着给定方向扫视可能性的增加,该方向刺激呈现时顺向扫视错误的百分比也增加。这些结果为以下假设提供了支持,即反扫视任务中的错误是运动准备水平提高的结果。