Wong Kenneth, Petchell Jeffrey
Department of Trauma, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Nov;74(11):992-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03213.x.
Trauma teams have been associated with improved survival probability of paediatric trauma patients. The present study seeks to estimate the use of trauma teams in Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres and describe their medical composition, leadership and criteria for activation.
Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres were identified. A structured questionnaire assessing the presence, composition and means of activation of a trauma team was mailed to the 'Director, Emergency Department' of all identified hospitals. Three months later, all hospitals were contacted by telephone to complete and verify data collection.
Questionnaires were distributed to eight hospitals. Seventy-five per cent had an established trauma team. Hospitals without a trauma team claimed to have insufficient doctors to form a team and insufficient trauma caseload to justify a team. All trauma teams were potentially activated by prehospital paramedic data (field triage) and required a combination of anatomical, physiological and mechanistic criteria for activation. The two methods of mobilizing a trauma team were by dispatching a common call onto individual pagers (66%) or a specific trauma pager (33%) carried by trauma team members. Fifty per cent of hospitals had a two-tier, stratified trauma team response. All teams consisted of emergency, surgical and intensive care unit registrars. Trauma team leaders were emergency medicine specialists/registrars (33%), surgical registrars (33%) and non-defined (33%). Consultant surgeons were not members of any trauma team. Eighty-three per cent of trauma teams consisted of more junior members after hours. Fifty per cent of hospitals did not have a surgical registrar on site outside of business hours. Eighty-eight per cent of hospitals engaged in some form of trauma audit.
Trauma teams are utilized by most Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres, with fairly uniform medical composition and criteria for activation. Paediatric surgeons presently have limited leadership roles and membership of Australian paediatric trauma teams.
创伤团队与提高儿科创伤患者的生存概率相关。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚儿科三级转诊中心创伤团队的使用情况,并描述其人员构成、领导架构及启动标准。
确定澳大利亚的儿科三级转诊中心。向所有已确定医院的“急诊科主任”邮寄一份结构化问卷,评估创伤团队的存在情况、人员构成及启动方式。三个月后,通过电话联系所有医院以完成并核实数据收集。
问卷发放给了八家医院。75%的医院设有创伤团队。没有创伤团队的医院称医生人数不足无法组建团队,且创伤病例量不足以支持设立一个团队。所有创伤团队都可能根据院前护理人员的数据(现场分诊)启动,启动需要结合解剖学、生理学和机制标准。调动创伤团队的两种方式是向个人传呼机发送通用呼叫信号(66%)或由创伤团队成员携带的特定创伤传呼机(33%)。50%的医院有两级分层的创伤团队响应机制。所有团队均由急诊科、外科和重症监护病房的住院医师组成。创伤团队负责人为急诊医学专科医生/住院医师(33%)、外科住院医师(33%)和未明确(33%)。顾问外科医生不是任何创伤团队的成员。83%的创伤团队在非工作时间由更多初级成员组成。50%的医院在非工作时间没有外科住院医师在岗。88%的医院开展了某种形式的创伤审计。
大多数澳大利亚儿科三级转诊中心都使用创伤团队,其人员构成和启动标准相当统一。目前,儿科外科医生在澳大利亚儿科创伤团队中的领导角色和成员身份有限。