• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少“狼来了”现象——改变儿科创伤中心的创伤团队启动机制

Reducing "cry wolf"--changing trauma team activation at a pediatric trauma centre.

作者信息

Bevan Catherine, Officer Clara, Crameri Joe, Palmer Cameron, Babl Franz E

机构信息

Trauma Service and Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):698-702. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318165b2f7.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318165b2f7
PMID:19276740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve utilization of scarce surgical resources, we changed from a single tier trauma paging system (TPS) to a three tiered TPS at a tertiary pediatric trauma center. We investigated if patients were appropriately classified into the three levels of trauma team activation.

METHODS

Trauma registry data were used to review data 12 months before and after implementation of a three tiered TPS (level I entire team present, level II surgical subspecialties within 10 minutes, level III emergency department team only at patient arrival). We correlated TPS activation with proxies of injury severity (admission status and major/nonmajor trauma).

RESULTS

There were 192 activations during 12 months of the single tier TPS and 216 during the three tier TPS (33 level I, 49 level II, and 134 level III). The entire team was to attend in all 192 single tier and in 82 (40%) level I and II three tier TPS activations i.e., there were 60% fewer surgical team activations. During single tier TPS, 96% patients were admitted and 23% classified as major trauma. Three tiered TPS level I, II and III were admitted in 97%, 94%, and 81% and classified as major trauma in 58%, 35%, and 15%, respectively. Of the 20 level III patients classified as major trauma, TPS level was deemed appropriate in 18 and inappropriately low in 2, although patient care had not been compromised.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a three tiered TPS more efficiently utilizes limited surgical resources without leading to major misclassifications.

摘要

背景

为提高稀缺手术资源的利用率,我们在一家三级儿科创伤中心将单层创伤传呼系统(TPS)改为三层TPS。我们调查了患者是否被正确分类到创伤团队激活的三个级别。

方法

使用创伤登记数据回顾三层TPS实施前后12个月的数据(一级全体团队到场,二级手术亚专科在10分钟内到场,三级仅急诊科团队在患者到达时到场)。我们将TPS激活与损伤严重程度的指标(入院状态和重伤/非重伤)相关联。

结果

单层TPS的12个月中有192次激活,三层TPS中有216次激活(33次一级、49次二级和134次三级)。全体团队应参加所有192次单层以及82次(40%)一级和二级三层TPS激活,即手术团队激活次数减少了60%。在单层TPS期间,96%的患者入院,23%被分类为重伤。三层TPS的一级、二级和三级患者入院率分别为97%、94%和81%,被分类为重伤的比例分别为58%、35%和15%。在20例被分类为重伤的三级患者中,18例的TPS级别被认为合适,2例被认为过低,尽管患者护理未受影响。

结论

我们的结果表明,三层TPS更有效地利用了有限的手术资源,且不会导致重大的错误分类。

相似文献

1
Reducing "cry wolf"--changing trauma team activation at a pediatric trauma centre.减少“狼来了”现象——改变儿科创伤中心的创伤团队启动机制
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):698-702. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318165b2f7.
2
The efficacy of a two-tiered trauma activation system at a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心两级创伤激活系统的疗效。
J Trauma. 2009 Oct;67(4):829-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b57b6d.
3
Is trauma centre care helpful for less severely injured patients?创伤中心护理对伤势较轻的患者有帮助吗?
Injury. 2005 Nov;36(11):1293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.041.
4
Trauma team activation and the impact on mortality.创伤团队启动及其对死亡率的影响。
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):326-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31811eaad1.
5
Paediatric trauma teams in Australia.澳大利亚的儿科创伤团队。
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Nov;74(11):992-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03213.x.
6
Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.一级创伤中心与二级创伤中心:基于结果的评估。
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1321-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181929e2b.
7
Paediatric trauma at an adult trauma centre.成人创伤中心的儿科创伤
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Oct;75(10):878-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03553.x.
8
Trauma care at rural level III trauma centers in a state trauma system.某州创伤系统中农村三级创伤中心的创伤护理
J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):498-503. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197671.00818.76.
9
Pregnancy is not a sufficient indicator for trauma team activation.怀孕并非启动创伤团队的充分指标。
J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):550-4; discussion 554-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31809ff244.
10
Medication reconciliation in a rural trauma population.农村创伤人群的用药核对
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.021. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of activation criteria in paediatric multi-trauma.儿童多发伤中激活标准的评估
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct 13;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac085. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: Implications for multi-level awareness.儿科创伤护理过程的复杂性:对多层次认知的启示
Cogn Technol Work. 2019 Aug;21(3):397-416. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
3
A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children.儿童医院创伤团队启动标准的系统评价
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001256.
4
Acute Medical Diagnoses Are Common in "Found Down" Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department as Trauma.急性内科诊断在因创伤就诊于急诊科的“被发现倒地”成年患者中很常见。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):992-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
A consensus-based criterion standard definition for pediatric patients who needed the highest-level trauma team activation.一个基于共识的标准定义,用于确定需要最高级别创伤团队激活的儿科患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Mar;78(3):634-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000543.
6
Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma: a statewide analysis, 1999-2008.1999 - 2008年老年创伤患者使用创伤中心的相关因素:一项全州范围的分析
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):585-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.311. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
7
The performance and assessment of hospital trauma teams.医院创伤团队的表现和评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Dec 13;18:66. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-66.