Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚的创伤团队:一项全国性调查。

Trauma teams in Australia: a national survey.

作者信息

Wong Kenneth, Petchell Jeffrey

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2003 Oct;73(10):819-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02782.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma teams have been associated with improved trauma patient outcomes. The present study seeks to estimate the use of trauma teams in Australian hospitals and describe their medical composition, leadership and criteria for activation.

METHODS

Australian public hospitals with more than 100 beds, an emergency department and offering surgical services were identified. A survey assessing the presence, composition and means of activation of a trauma team was mailed to the 'Director, Emergency Department' of all identified hospitals. Three months later, all hospitals were contacted by telephone to complete and verify data collection.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were distributed to 130 hospitals. After exclusion of hospitals that did not receive patients with traumatic injuries, and dedicated paediatric tertiary referral centres, 111 hospitals remained for analysis. Of these, 56% had an established trauma team, while 71% of hospitals without a trauma team claimed to have insufficient doctors to form one team. Ninety-five per cent of trauma teams were potentially activated by prehospital paramedic data (field triage). For 92% of trauma teams a combination of anatomical, physiological and mechanistic criteria were required for activation. The most common methods of mobilizing a trauma team were by dispatching a common call onto individual pagers (31%) or by paging trauma team members individually (31%). Fifty-eight per cent of trauma team leaders were emergency medicine specialists/registrars, while 8% of trauma teams were led by surgeons/registrars. Consultant surgeons were members of 23% of trauma teams and 74% of trauma teams consisted of more junior members after hours. Some form of trauma audit was engaged in by 64% of hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma teams are yet to be utilized by many Australian hospitals that provide trauma care. Australian surgeons presently have limited leadership roles and membership in trauma teams. Trauma audit can be more widely adopted in Australian hospitals.

摘要

背景

创伤团队与改善创伤患者的治疗结果相关。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚医院创伤团队的使用情况,并描述其医疗组成、领导情况及启动标准。

方法

确定澳大利亚拥有100张以上床位、设有急诊科并提供外科服务的公立医院。向所有确定的医院的“急诊科主任”邮寄了一份评估创伤团队的存在、组成和启动方式的调查问卷。三个月后,通过电话联系所有医院以完成并核实数据收集。

结果

向130家医院分发了问卷。在排除未接收创伤患者的医院以及专门的儿科三级转诊中心后,剩余111家医院进行分析。其中,56%的医院设有创伤团队,而71%没有创伤团队的医院称医生不足无法组建一个团队。95%的创伤团队可通过院前护理人员数据(现场分诊)启动。92%的创伤团队启动需要解剖学、生理学和机制标准相结合。调动创伤团队最常见的方法是向个人传呼机发送通用呼叫(31%)或分别传呼创伤团队成员(31%)。58%的创伤团队领导是急诊医学专家/住院医生,而8%的创伤团队由外科医生/住院医生领导。顾问外科医生是23%的创伤团队的成员,74%的创伤团队在下班后由级别较低的成员组成。64%的医院进行了某种形式的创伤审计。

结论

许多提供创伤护理的澳大利亚医院尚未使用创伤团队。目前澳大利亚外科医生在创伤团队中的领导角色和成员身份有限。创伤审计在澳大利亚医院可更广泛地采用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验