Möller H J, Riedel M, Müller N, Fischer W, Kohnen R
Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2004 Nov;37(6):270-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832683.
In contrast to traditional antipsychotic medication, newer, the so called atypical antipsychotic drugs promise to reduce primary negative symptoms in both, acute and chronic schizophrenia and improve quality of life. Zotepine, a D (2)5HT (2A) antagonist, was compared to placebo in this clinical trial to address these issues.
In an adaptive, 8-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, efficacy and tolerability as well as influence on quality of life of zotepine and placebo were compared in 80 schizophrenic patients (53 % males, age 41 +/- 11 years) who experienced stable primary negative symptoms. Efficacy was assessed using the PANSS (primary outcome criterion: PANSS negative score), CGI, and MADRS; safety was controlled by EPS (Simpson-Angus Scale), TDRS and adverse events. Quality of life was evaluated with the SF-36 health questionnaire.
After eight weeks of treatment with an average dose of 131 +/- 49 mg/day of zotepine, no superior efficacy of zotepine compared to placebo with respect to the PANSS subscale "negative symptoms could be demonstrated. Although patients receiving zotepine showed a pronounced reduction (per protocol set: -7.8 +/- 5.8) during treatment, it was not statistically different from a marked placebo response (-6.5 +/- 5.8). Similar small but not significant differences between zotepine and placebo were found in other subscales of the PANSS, the CGI and the MADRS. With regards to the quality of life assessment, patients under zotepine showed better results in the physical component scale and psychological well-being scale. In general, zotepine was well tolerated and there was no excess of extrapyramidal symptoms compared to placebo.
Zotepine was not superior to placebo in reducing the severity of stable primary negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients in this trial. The main reasons for this finding were a high placebo response in a selected population, a probably too low dose of zotepine, and a short study period. However, several findings show clinical benefit of zotepine therapy in efficacy and quality of life.
与传统抗精神病药物不同,新型的所谓非典型抗精神病药物有望减轻急性和慢性精神分裂症的原发性阴性症状,并改善生活质量。在这项临床试验中,将多靶点抗精神病药氨磺必利与安慰剂进行比较,以解决这些问题。
在一项适应性、为期8周的多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究中,比较了氨磺必利和安慰剂对80例患有稳定原发性阴性症状的精神分裂症患者(53%为男性,年龄41±11岁)的疗效、耐受性以及对生活质量的影响。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(主要结局标准:阳性和阴性症状量表阴性评分)、临床总体印象量表和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表评估疗效;通过锥体外系反应(辛普森-安格斯量表)、迟发性运动障碍评定量表和不良事件控制安全性。用SF-36健康问卷评估生活质量。
在平均剂量为131±49mg/天的氨磺必利治疗8周后,在阳性和阴性症状量表“阴性症状”分量表方面,未显示氨磺必利比安慰剂有更高的疗效。尽管接受氨磺必利治疗的患者在治疗期间有明显下降(根据方案设定:-7.8±5.8),但与显著的安慰剂反应(-6.5±5.8)无统计学差异。在阳性和阴性症状量表、临床总体印象量表和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表的其他分量表中,氨磺必利与安慰剂之间也发现了类似的小但无统计学意义的差异。关于生活质量评估,接受氨磺必利治疗的患者在身体成分量表和心理健康量表中显示出更好的结果。总体而言,氨磺必利耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比,锥体外系症状并无增加。
在本试验中,氨磺必利在减轻精神分裂症患者稳定的原发性阴性症状严重程度方面并不优于安慰剂。这一发现的主要原因是在选定人群中安慰剂反应较高、氨磺必利剂量可能过低以及研究期较短。然而,一些研究结果显示氨磺必利治疗在疗效和生活质量方面具有临床益处。