Roberts Kay Kathryn L, Turnbull Beverley J
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Science, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Contemp Nurse. 2004 Oct;17(3):282-92. doi: 10.5172/conu.17.3.282.
The reward system within Universities remains focused on research, with a benchmark of scholarly productivity, especially in relation to promotion. Despite their relative newness to the tertiary system, nurse academics are judged by the same standards as other disciplines. This study sought to examine factors that constrained and/or facilitated scholarly productivity. The study used a questionnaire survey technique to establish current productivity levels, and frame and facilitating factor theory and analysis to identify major constraints and facilitators. Findings from the study were that the unremitting nature of teaching, course coordination and university service workloads interact to the detriment of research and writing. Facilitating factors included a departmental culture that values and supports research, in conjunction with tangible support from University management. Mentorship was viewed as desirable, but often not available. An environment that more actively prioritises, fosters and supports academic scholarly productivity is needed.
大学内部的奖励体系仍然侧重于研究,以学术产出为基准,尤其是在晋升方面。尽管护士学者在高等教育体系中相对较新,但他们与其他学科一样按照相同的标准进行评判。本研究旨在探讨制约和/或促进学术产出的因素。该研究采用问卷调查技术来确定当前的产出水平,并运用促进因素理论与分析来识别主要的制约因素和促进因素。研究结果表明,教学、课程协调和大学服务工作量的持续性质相互作用,对研究和写作产生不利影响。促进因素包括重视和支持研究的部门文化,以及大学管理层的切实支持。指导被认为是可取的,但往往难以获得。需要一个更积极地将学术产出作为优先事项、培育并支持其发展的环境。