Nolan Marie T, Wenzel Jennifer, Han Hae-Ra, Allen Jerilyn K, Paez Kathryn A, Mock Victoria
Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Prof Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;24(6):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.10.014.
Doctoral students and new faculty members often seek advice from more senior faculty on how to advance their program of research. Students may ask whether they should choose the manuscript option for their dissertation or whether they should seek a postdoctoral fellowship. New faculty members wonder whether they should pursue a career development award and whether they need a mentor as they strive to advance their research while carrying out teaching, service, and practice responsibilities. In this article, we describe literature on the impact of selected aspects of pre- and postdoctoral training and faculty strategies on scholarly productivity in the faculty role. We also combine our experiences at a school of nursing within a research-intensive university to suggest strategies for success. Noting the scarcity of research that evaluates the effect of these strategies, we are actively engaged in collecting data on their relationship to the scholarly productivity of students and faculty members within our own institution.
博士生和新入职的教员经常向资深教员寻求关于如何推进其研究项目的建议。学生们可能会问,他们的博士论文是应该选择撰写手稿的形式,还是应该申请博士后奖学金。新入职的教员则会思考,他们是否应该争取职业发展奖,以及在努力推进研究的同时还要承担教学、服务和实践职责时,是否需要一位导师。在本文中,我们描述了有关博士前和博士后培训的某些方面以及教员策略对教员角色中学术生产力影响的文献。我们还结合了我们在一所研究密集型大学的护理学院的经验,提出成功的策略。鉴于评估这些策略效果的研究稀缺,我们正积极收集有关它们与我们所在机构内学生和教员学术生产力关系的数据。