Holm C, Mayr M, Tegeler J, Hörbrand F, Henckel von Donnersmarck G, Mühlbauer W, Pfeiffer U J
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Burn Centre, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Technical University Munich, Englschalkingerstrasse 77, 81927 Munich, Germany.
Burns. 2004 Dec;30(8):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.016.
Ever since Charles Baxter's recommendations the standard regime for burn shock resuscitation remains crystalloid infusion at a rate of 4 ml/kg/% burn in the first 24h following the thermal injury. A growing number of studies on invasive monitoring in burn shock, however, have raised a debate regarding the adequacy of this regime. The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to compare goal-directed therapy guided by invasive monitoring with standard care (Baxter formula) in patients with burn shock.
Fifty consecutive patients with burns involving more than 20% body surface area were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The control group was resuscitated according to the Baxter formula (4 ml/kg BW/% BSA burn), the thermodilution (TDD) group was treated according to a volumetric preload endpoint (intrathoracic blood volume) obtained by invasive haemodynamic monitoring.
The baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. Fluid administration in the initial 24h after burn was significantly higher in the TDD treatment group than in the control group (P = 0.0001). The results of haemodynamic monitoring showed no significant difference in preload or cardiac output parameters. Signs of significant intravasal hypovolemia as indicated by subnormal values of intrathoracic and total blood volumes were present in both treatment groups. Mortality and morbidity were independent on randomisation.
Burn shock resuscitation due to the Baxter formula leads to significant hypovolemia during the first 48 h following burn. Haemodynamic monitoring results in more aggressive therapeutic strategies and is associated with a significant increase in fluid administration. Increased crystalloid infusion does not improve preload or cardiac output parameters. This may be due to the fact that a pure crystalloid resuscitation is incapable of restoring cardiac preload during the period of burn shock.
自查尔斯·巴克斯特提出建议以来,烧伤休克复苏的标准方案仍是在热损伤后的头24小时内,以4毫升/千克/烧伤面积百分比的速率进行晶体液输注。然而,越来越多关于烧伤休克有创监测的研究引发了对该方案是否充分的争论。这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较烧伤休克患者中,有创监测指导的目标导向治疗与标准治疗(巴克斯特公式)。
连续50例烧伤面积超过20%体表面积的患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一。对照组按照巴克斯特公式(4毫升/千克体重/烧伤面积百分比)进行复苏,热稀释(TDD)组根据通过有创血流动力学监测获得的容量预负荷终点(胸腔内血容量)进行治疗。
两个治疗组的基线特征相似。烧伤后最初24小时内,TDD治疗组的液体输注量显著高于对照组(P = 0.0001)。血流动力学监测结果显示,预负荷或心输出量参数无显著差异。两个治疗组均存在胸腔内和总血容量值低于正常所表明的明显血管内血容量不足的迹象。死亡率和发病率与随机分组无关。
因巴克斯特公式进行的烧伤休克复苏在烧伤后的头48小时内导致显著的血容量不足。血流动力学监测导致更积极的治疗策略,并与液体输注量显著增加相关。晶体液输注量增加并未改善预负荷或心输出量参数。这可能是由于单纯晶体液复苏在烧伤休克期间无法恢复心脏预负荷。