Wang Guang-Yi, Ma Bing, Tang Hong-Tai, Zhu Shi-Hui, Lu Jian, Wei Wei, Ge Sheng-De, Xia Zhao-Fan
Department of Burn Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1396-401. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180f62643.
Ever since the introduction of invasive hemodynamic monitoring to major burn care, its utility remains controversial. Besides complications, invasive monitoring as a guideline for burn shock resuscitation is often associated with significant excessive fluid burden. This study was to summarize the clinical experiences of noninvasive esophageal echo-Doppler (ED) monitoring in burn shock resuscitation and discuss the significance of hemodynamic variables in assessment of fluid therapeutic goal.
Twenty-one burn patients with an average total body surface area of 78.86% +/- 7.75% (62-92%) was enrolled in this retrospective study. Fluid therapy was guided according to Chinese general formula and adjusted with urinary output 1 mL/kg/hr as resuscitation goal. Hemodynamic parameters using ED was obtained, including cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), myocardial contractility parameter--maximum acceleration at onset of systole (Acc), afterload parameter--total systemic vascular resistance (TSVR), preload parameter SV/Acc.
All patients were clinically diagnosed with a relatively stable condition during early shock stage. There existed inherent and dynamic tendency of hemodynamics during burn shock resuscitation with low CO, Acc, SV/Acc, and high TSVR at first followed by a continuous trend of increase in CO, Acc and SV/Acc and decrease in TSVR. Significant correlations could be seen between CO and Acc, CO and TSVR, CO and SV/Acc. The Standardized Regression Coefficients of Acc, TSVR, and SV/Acc with CO as dependent variable were 0.343, -0.670, and 0.053, respectively demonstrating that myocardial contractility and angiotasis played more important role than blood volume did in hemodynamic variation.
Hemodynamic variables cannot routinely substitute traditional variables as the burn shock resuscitation goal. Because of its noninvasiveness, ability to real-timely provide complete profile of hemodynamics, ED monitoring is a good adjunctive method for clinical judgment.
自从有创血流动力学监测引入严重烧伤治疗以来,其效用一直存在争议。除了并发症外,作为烧伤休克复苏指南的有创监测常常伴随着显著的过多液体负荷。本研究旨在总结无创食管回声多普勒(ED)监测在烧伤休克复苏中的临床经验,并探讨血流动力学变量在评估液体治疗目标中的意义。
本回顾性研究纳入了21例烧伤患者,平均烧伤总面积为78.86%±7.75%(62%-92%)。根据中国通用公式进行液体治疗,并以尿量1 mL/kg/hr作为复苏目标进行调整。使用ED获得血流动力学参数,包括心输出量(CO)、每搏输出量(SV)、心肌收缩力参数——收缩期开始时的最大加速度(Acc)、后负荷参数——总全身血管阻力(TSVR)、前负荷参数SV/Acc。
所有患者在休克早期临床诊断病情相对稳定。烧伤休克复苏过程中血流动力学存在内在和动态变化趋势,起初CO、Acc、SV/Acc较低,TSVR较高,随后CO、Acc和SV/Acc持续升高,TSVR降低。CO与Acc、CO与TSVR、CO与SV/Acc之间存在显著相关性。以CO为因变量时,Acc、TSVR和SV/Acc的标准化回归系数分别为0.343、-0.670和0.053,表明在血流动力学变化中,心肌收缩力和血管张力比血容量起更重要的作用。
血流动力学变量不能常规替代传统变量作为烧伤休克复苏目标。由于其无创性、能够实时提供完整的血流动力学概况,ED监测是临床判断的一种良好辅助方法。