Suppr超能文献

自我报告健康状况中的切点偏移和指标偏移。

Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported health.

作者信息

Lindeboom Maarten, van Doorslaer Eddy

机构信息

Department of Economics, Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, Free University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1005, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1083-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.01.002.

Abstract

There is some concern that ordered responses on health questions may differ across populations or even across subgroups of a population. This reporting heterogeneity may invalidate group comparisons and measures of health inequality. This paper proposes a test for differential reporting in ordered response models which enables to distinguish between cut-point shift and index shift. The method is illustrated using Canadian National Population Health Survey data. The McMaster Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is used as a more objective health measure than the simple five-point scale of self-assessed health. We find clear evidence of index shifting and cut-point shifting for age and gender, but not for income, education or language.

摘要

有人担心,在健康问题上的有序回答可能因人群而异,甚至在同一人群的不同亚组之间也存在差异。这种报告异质性可能会使组间比较和健康不平等衡量指标无效。本文提出了一种用于有序响应模型中差异报告的检验方法,该方法能够区分切点移动和指数移动。使用加拿大国家人口健康调查数据对该方法进行了说明。与简单的五点自我评估健康量表相比,麦克马斯特健康效用指数Mark 3(HUI3)被用作更客观的健康衡量指标。我们发现年龄和性别存在明显的指数移动和切点移动证据,但收入、教育程度或语言方面则没有。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验