Trabbic-Carlson Kimberly, Liu Li, Kim Bumjoon, Chilkoti Ashutosh
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Protein Sci. 2004 Dec;13(12):3274-84. doi: 10.1110/ps.04931604.
Thermally responsive elastin like polypeptides (ELPs) can be used to purify proteins from Escherichia coli culture when proteins are expressed as a fusion with an ELP. Nonchromatographic purification of ELP fusion proteins, termed inverse transition cycling (ITC), exploits the reversible soluble-insoluble phase transition behavior imparted by the ELP tag. Here, we quantitatively compare the expression and purification of ELP and oligohistidine fusions of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), blue fluorescent protein (BFP), thioredoxin (Trx), and calmodulin (CalM) from both a 4-h culture with chemical induction of the plasmid-borne fusion protein gene and a 24-h culture without chemical induction. The total protein content and functional activity were quantified at each ITC purification step. For CAT, BFP, and Trx, the 24-h noninduction culture of ELP fusion proteins results in a sevenfold increase in the yield of each fusion protein compared to that obtained by the 4-h-induced culture, and the calculated target protein yield is similar to that of their equivalent oligohistidine fusion. For these proteins, ITC purification of fusion proteins also results in approximately 75% recovery of active fusion protein, similar to affinity chromatography. Compared to chromatographic purification, however, ITC is inexpensive, requires no specialized equipment or reagents, and because ITC is a batch purification process, it is easily scaled up to accommodate larger culture volumes or scaled down and multiplexed for high-throughput, microscale purification; thus, potentially impacting both high-throughput protein expression and purification for proteomics and large scale, cost-effective industrial bioprocessing of pharmaceutically relevant proteins.
当蛋白质与热响应性弹性蛋白样多肽(ELP)融合表达时,可用于从大肠杆菌培养物中纯化蛋白质。ELP融合蛋白的非色谱纯化方法,即反向转变循环(ITC),利用了ELP标签赋予的可逆的可溶-不溶相变行为。在此,我们定量比较了氯霉素乙酰转移酶(CAT)、蓝色荧光蛋白(BFP)、硫氧还蛋白(Trx)和钙调蛋白(CalM)的ELP融合蛋白与寡聚组氨酸融合蛋白,在化学诱导质粒携带的融合蛋白基因的4小时培养物和未进行化学诱导的24小时培养物中的表达和纯化情况。在每个ITC纯化步骤中对总蛋白含量和功能活性进行了定量。对于CAT、BFP和Trx,与4小时诱导培养相比,ELP融合蛋白的24小时非诱导培养使每种融合蛋白的产量提高了7倍,计算得到的目标蛋白产量与它们相应的寡聚组氨酸融合蛋白相似。对于这些蛋白,融合蛋白的ITC纯化还能使活性融合蛋白的回收率达到约75%,与亲和色谱法相似。然而,与色谱纯化相比,ITC成本低廉,不需要专门的设备或试剂,而且由于ITC是一种批量纯化过程,很容易扩大规模以适应更大的培养体积,或者缩小规模并进行多重操作以实现高通量、微尺度纯化;因此,它可能会对蛋白质组学的高通量蛋白质表达和纯化以及与药物相关蛋白质的大规模、经济高效的工业生物加工产生影响。