Kittleson Michelle M, Ye Shui Q, Irizarry Rafael A, Minhas Khalid M, Edness Gina, Conte John V, Parmigiani Giovanni, Miller Leslie W, Chen Yingjie, Hall Jennifer L, Garcia Joe G N, Hare Joshua M
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.
Circulation. 2004 Nov 30;110(22):3444-51. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148178.19465.11. Epub 2004 Nov 22.
Gene expression profiling refines diagnostic and prognostic assessment in oncology but has not yet been applied to myocardial diseases. We hypothesized that gene expression differentiates ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, demonstrating that gene expression profiling by clinical parameters is feasible in cardiology.
Affymetrix U133A microarrays of 48 myocardial samples from Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and the University of Minnesota (UM) obtained (1) at transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement (end-stage; n=25), (2) after LVAD support (post-LVAD; n=16), and (3) from newly diagnosed patients (biopsy; n=7) were analyzed with prediction analysis of microarrays. A training set was used to develop the profile and test sets to validate the accuracy of the profile. An etiology prediction profile developed in end-stage JHH samples was tested in independent samples from both JHH and UM with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in end-stage samples and 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both post-LVAD and biopsy samples. The overall sensitivity was 89% (95% CI 75% to 100%), and specificity was 89% (95% CI 60% to 100%) over 210 random partitions of end-stage samples into training and test sets. Age, gender, and hemodynamic differences did not affect the profile's accuracy in stratified analyses. Select gene expression was confirmed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Gene expression profiling accurately predicts cardiomyopathy etiology, is generalizable to samples from separate institutions, is specific to disease stage, and is unaffected by differences in clinical characteristics. This strongly supports ongoing efforts to incorporate expression profiling-based biomarkers in determining prognosis and response to therapy in heart failure.
基因表达谱分析可优化肿瘤学中的诊断和预后评估,但尚未应用于心肌疾病。我们推测基因表达可区分缺血性和非缺血性心肌病,表明通过临床参数进行基因表达谱分析在心脏病学中是可行的。
对来自约翰霍普金斯医院(JHH)和明尼苏达大学(UM)的48份心肌样本进行Affymetrix U133A微阵列分析,这些样本分别在以下情况下获取:(1)移植时或植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)时(终末期;n = 25),(2)LVAD支持后(LVAD术后;n = 16),以及(3)新诊断患者(活检;n = 7),使用微阵列预测分析进行分析。一个训练集用于建立图谱,测试集用于验证图谱的准确性。在JHH终末期样本中建立的病因预测图谱在来自JHH和UM的独立样本中进行测试,在终末期样本中敏感性为100%,特异性为100%,在LVAD术后和活检样本中敏感性为33%,特异性为100%。在将终末期样本随机分为训练集和测试集的210次划分中,总体敏感性为89%(95%CI 75%至100%),特异性为89%(95%CI 60%至100%)。在分层分析中,年龄、性别和血流动力学差异不影响图谱的准确性。通过定量聚合酶链反应确认了选定基因的表达。
基因表达谱分析可准确预测心肌病病因,可推广到来自不同机构的样本,特定于疾病阶段,且不受临床特征差异的影响。这有力地支持了在心力衰竭的预后和治疗反应评估中纳入基于表达谱的生物标志物的持续努力。