Matsumura Hirofumi, Hudson Mark J
Department of Anatomy, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8556, Japan.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Jun;127(2):182-209. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20067.
This article uses metric and nonmetric dental data to test the "two-layer" or immigration hypothesis whereby Southeast Asia was initially occupied by an "Australo-Melanesian" population that later underwent substantial genetic admixture with East Asian immigrants associated with the spread of agriculture from the Neolithic period onwards. We examined teeth from 4,002 individuals comprising 42 prehistoric and historic samples from East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia, and Melanesia. For the odontometric analysis, dental size proportions were compared using factor analysis and Q-mode correlation coefficients, and overall tooth size was also compared between population samples. Nonmetric population affinities were estimated by Smith's distances, using the frequencies of 16 tooth traits. The results of both the metric and nonmetric analyses demonstrate close affinities between recent Australo-Melanesian samples and samples representing early Southeast Asia, such as the Early to Middle Holocene series from Vietnam, Malaysia, and Flores. In contrast, the dental characteristics of most modern Southeast Asians exhibit a mixture of traits associated with East Asians and Australo-Melanesians, suggesting that these populations were genetically influenced by immigrants from East Asia. East Asian metric and/or nonmetric traits are also found in some prehistoric samples from Southeast Asia such as Ban Kao (Thailand), implying that immigration probably began in the early Neolithic. Much clearer influence of East Asian immigration was found in Early Metal Age Vietnamese and Sulawesi samples. Although the results of this study are consistent with the immigration hypothesis, analysis of additional Neolithic samples is needed to determine the exact timing of population dispersals into Southeast Asia.
本文使用了测量学和非测量学的牙齿数据来检验“两层”或移民假说,即东南亚最初由“澳大利亚-美拉尼西亚”人群占据,后来该人群与自新石器时代起随着农业传播而来的东亚移民进行了大量基因混合。我们检查了4002个人的牙齿,这些牙齿来自东亚、东南亚、澳大利亚和美拉尼西亚的42个史前和历史样本。对于牙齿测量分析,使用因子分析和Q模式相关系数比较牙齿大小比例,并在不同人群样本之间比较整体牙齿大小。通过史密斯距离,利用16种牙齿特征的频率估计非测量学的人群亲缘关系。测量学和非测量学分析的结果都表明,近期澳大利亚-美拉尼西亚样本与代表早期东南亚的样本(如来自越南、马来西亚和弗洛雷斯的早全新世至中全新世系列样本)之间有密切的亲缘关系。相比之下,大多数现代东南亚人的牙齿特征表现出与东亚人和澳大利亚-美拉尼西亚人相关特征的混合,这表明这些人群在基因上受到了东亚移民的影响。在东南亚的一些史前样本(如泰国的班考)中也发现了东亚的测量学和/或非测量学特征,这意味着移民可能始于新石器时代早期。在早期金属时代的越南和苏拉威西样本中发现了东亚移民更明显的影响。尽管本研究的结果与移民假说一致,但还需要对更多新石器时代样本进行分析,以确定人群向东南亚扩散的确切时间。