Coppa A, Cucina A, Lucci M, Mancinelli D, Vargiu R
Department of Human and Animal Biology, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Jul;133(3):918-30. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20620.
Dental morphological traits were employed in this study as direct indicators of biological affinities among the populations that inhabited the Italian peninsula from the Upper Paleolithic-Mesolithic to Medieval times. Our analysis aims at contributing to the ongoing debate regarding the origin and spread of agriculture in the peninsula by contrasting the dental evidence of archaeological and modern molecular samples. It is not possible to generalize given the complex and dynamic nature of these populations. However, the results from the principal component analysis, maximum likelihood, mean measure of divergence, and multidimensional scaling do indicate a net separation of the Paleo-Mesolithic sample from the other groups that is not related to dental reduction. This suggests that the shift in dental morphology was the product of Neolithic populations migrating into the peninsula from other areas. Nonetheless, the Paleo-Mesolithic populations share several discriminative traits with the Neolithic group. The biological relevance of such evidence suggests that, to some minor extent, the spread of agriculture did not occur by total population replacement. Because of regional small sample sizes, this hypothesis cannot be tested on a micro-regional scale. It is, however, feasible to depict a scenario where processes of genetic mixture or replacement probably took place at different rates on a macro-regional level.
在本研究中,牙齿形态特征被用作从旧石器时代晚期 - 中石器时代到中世纪居住在意大利半岛的人群之间生物亲缘关系的直接指标。我们的分析旨在通过对比考古样本和现代分子样本的牙齿证据,为半岛农业起源和传播的持续争论做出贡献。鉴于这些人群的复杂性和动态性,无法进行一概而论。然而,主成分分析、最大似然法、平均差异度量和多维尺度分析的结果确实表明,旧石器 - 中石器时代样本与其他群体之间存在净分离,这与牙齿简化无关。这表明牙齿形态的转变是新石器时代人群从其他地区迁入半岛的产物。尽管如此,旧石器 - 中石器时代人群与新石器时代群体有一些区别性特征。此类证据的生物学相关性表明,在一定程度上,农业的传播并非完全通过人口替代发生。由于区域样本量较小,这一假设无法在微观区域尺度上进行检验。然而,描绘一个在宏观区域层面上遗传混合或替代过程可能以不同速率发生的情景是可行的。