Rodriguez Evelio, Baas Paul, Friedberg Joseph S
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 605, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Thorac Surg Clin. 2004 Nov;14(4):557-66. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2004.06.004.
Photodynamic diagnosis could be a useful tool for improving the diagnostic yield of tumor biopsy, especially for mesothelioma tumors that are sclerotic and particularly hypocellular. For PDD, the use of low doses of a sensitizing drug, such as 5-ALA, must be investigated further. The initial results of 5-ALA-mediated PDD are promising. The role, if any, for PDT in the treatment of mesothelioma has yet to be established. The number of centers exploring this technology is limited because the procedure is labor intensive and requires not only specialized equipment but also physician support. The number of patients treated in the different trials is small, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Further complicating the interpretation of published results is the number of variables (i.e., type of sensitizer, light dose, drug dose, drug light interval, methods of light measurement, technique of light delivery, surgical debulking techniques), which differ between studies. Most reports are phase I and II studies. The final outcome of these studies with respect to survival is of limited value. The only phase III study, which was performed with an earlier generation photosensitizer, reported no advantage to the use of PDT in combination with surgery and immunochemotherapy. To date, the most that can be said is that intraoperative PDT can be performed safely in experienced centers and that there are some encouraging results, especially in patients with stages I and II MPM, particularly with the newer generation photosensitizers. One attractive aspect of this adjuvant treatment is that PDT, as opposed to some of the other adjuvant treatments combined with surgery, may offer the option of effecting adequate tumor debulking with a pulmonary-sparing procedure.
光动力诊断可能是提高肿瘤活检诊断率的有用工具,特别是对于硬化性且细胞含量特别少的间皮瘤肿瘤。对于光动力诊断,必须进一步研究低剂量致敏药物(如5-氨基乙酰丙酸)的使用。5-氨基乙酰丙酸介导的光动力诊断的初步结果很有前景。光动力疗法在间皮瘤治疗中的作用(如果有)尚未确定。探索这项技术的中心数量有限,因为该过程劳动强度大,不仅需要专门设备,还需要医生支持。不同试验中治疗的患者数量较少,无法得出明确结论。使已发表结果的解读更加复杂的是研究之间存在差异的变量数量(即致敏剂类型、光剂量、药物剂量、药物与光间隔、光测量方法、光传输技术、手术减瘤技术)。大多数报告是I期和II期研究。这些研究关于生存的最终结果价值有限。唯一一项使用早期一代光敏剂进行的III期研究报告称,光动力疗法联合手术和免疫化疗没有优势。迄今为止,最多只能说术中光动力疗法在经验丰富的中心可以安全进行,并且有一些令人鼓舞的结果,特别是在I期和II期恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中,尤其是使用新一代光敏剂时。这种辅助治疗的一个吸引人的方面是,与一些其他与手术联合的辅助治疗不同,光动力疗法可能提供通过保留肺的手术实现充分肿瘤减瘤的选择。