Potempa Kathleen M, Tilden Virginia
Oregon Health & Science University, School of Nursing, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-2941, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Nov;43(11):502-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20041101-01.
If funding level is accepted as an empirical referent of research productivity, the nursing profession's relatively low volume of funded research puts its capacity to influence practice and policy based on scientific evidence at a disadvantage. For the profession to effectively compete with other "high-impact," health-related disciplines, nursing leaders must find ways for a greater proportion of nursing faculty to excel as scientists, producing sufficient volume and quality of work in their careers to have a major influence on health care. In addition, if nursing leaders are to enhance nurses' interest in scientific development and use, the academic environment needs to foster greater connectivity of students at all levels of education with the scientific enterprise.
如果将资金水平视为研究生产力的一个实证参照标准,那么护理专业获得资助的研究数量相对较少,这使其基于科学证据影响实践和政策的能力处于劣势。为了使该专业能有效地与其他“高影响力”的健康相关学科竞争,护理领域的领导者必须找到方法,让更大比例的护理教员成长为优秀的科学家,在其职业生涯中产出足够数量和质量的研究成果,从而对医疗保健产生重大影响。此外,如果护理领域的领导者想要提高护士对科学发展和应用的兴趣,学术环境需要促进各级教育阶段的学生与科研事业建立更紧密的联系。