Sturzenegger Christian, Bassetti Claudio L
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Sleep Res. 2004 Dec;13(4):395-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00422.x.
In the absence of a golden standard for the diagnosis of narcolepsy, the clinical spectrum of disorder remains controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to determine frequency and characteristics of sleep-wake symptoms in patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy, (2) to compare clinical characteristics with results of ancillary tests, and (3) to identify factors that discriminate narcolepsy from other conditions with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). We prospectively studied 57 narcoleptics with cataplexy, 56 patients with non-narcoleptic hypersomnia (H), and 40 normal controls (No). Based on suggested and published criteria, we differentiated between narcoleptics with definite cataplexy (N) and narcoleptics without definite cataplexy (possible cataplexy, NpC). Assessment consisted of questionnaires [all patients and controls, including the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Score (UNS)], polysomnography (all patients), multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and human leukocyte antigen typing (in most narcoleptics). A new narcolepsy score based on five questions was developed. Data were compared with those of 12 hypocretin-deficient narcoleptics (N-hd). There were significant differences between N and NpC (including mean sleep latency on MSLT), but none between N and N-hd. A score of sleep propensity during active situations (SPAS) and the frequency of sleep paralysis/hallucinations at sleep onset, dreams of flying, and history of sleep shouting discriminated N from H and No (P < 0.001). Cataplexy-like symptoms in H (18%) and No (8%) could be discriminated from 'true' cataplexy in N on the basis of topography of motor effects, triggering emotions and triggering situations (P < 0.001). Our narcolepsy score had a similar sensitivity (96% versus 98%) but a higher specificity (98% versus 56%) than the UNS. Analysis of co-occurring symptoms in narcolepsy revealed two symptom complexes: EDS, cataplexy, automatic behaviors; and sleep paralysis, hallucinations, parasomnias. Low/undetectable cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 levels and a history of definite cataplexy identify similar subgroups of narcoleptics. Specific questions on severity of EDS (SPAS score) and characteristics of cataplexy allow the recognition of subgroups of narcoleptics and their differentiation from non-narcoleptic EDS patients, including those reporting cataplexy-like episodes. The existence of co-occurring symptoms supports the hypothesis of a distinct pathophysiology of single narcoleptic symptoms.
由于发作性睡病的诊断缺乏金标准,该疾病的临床谱仍存在争议。本研究的目的是:(1)确定伴猝倒的发作性睡病患者睡眠-觉醒症状的频率和特征;(2)将临床特征与辅助检查结果进行比较;(3)识别能够将发作性睡病与其他伴有日间过度嗜睡(EDS)的疾病区分开来的因素。我们对57例伴猝倒的发作性睡病患者、56例非发作性睡病性失眠患者(H)和40例正常对照者(No)进行了前瞻性研究。根据推荐的和已发表的标准,我们区分了有明确猝倒的发作性睡病患者(N)和无明确猝倒的发作性睡病患者(可能有猝倒,NpC)。评估包括问卷调查[所有患者和对照者,包括乌洛林纳发作性睡病评分(UNS)]、多导睡眠图(所有患者)、多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)和人类白细胞抗原分型(大多数发作性睡病患者)。基于五个问题制定了一个新的发作性睡病评分。将数据与12例下丘脑分泌素缺乏的发作性睡病患者(N-hd)的数据进行了比较。N和NpC之间存在显著差异(包括MSLT上的平均睡眠潜伏期),但N和N-hd之间无差异。活动状态下的睡眠倾向评分(SPAS)以及入睡时睡眠麻痹/幻觉的频率、飞翔梦境和睡眠喊叫史可将N与H和No区分开来(P<0.001)。根据运动效应的部位、触发情绪和触发情境,可将H组(18%)和No组(8%)中类似猝倒的症状与N组中的“真正”猝倒区分开来(P<0.001)。我们的发作性睡病评分与UNS相比,具有相似的敏感性(分别为96%和98%),但特异性更高(分别为98%和56%)。对发作性睡病中共存症状的分析揭示了两种症状复合体:EDS、猝倒、自动行为;以及睡眠麻痹、幻觉、异态睡眠。脑脊液下丘脑分泌素-1水平低/检测不到以及明确的猝倒病史可识别出类似的发作性睡病亚组。关于EDS严重程度的特定问题(SPAS评分)和猝倒特征可识别出发作性睡病亚组,并将其与非发作性睡病性EDS患者区分开来,包括那些报告有类似猝倒发作的患者。共存症状的存在支持了单一发作性睡病症状具有独特病理生理学的假说。