Hong Seung-Chul, Lin Ling, Jeong Jong-Hyun, Shin Yoon-Kyung, Han Jin-Hee, Lee Ji-Hyun, Lee Sung-Pil, Zhang Jing, Einen Mali, Mignot Emmanuel
Department of Neuropsychiatry, St. Vincent' s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
Sleep. 2006 Nov;29(11):1429-38. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.11.1429.
To study DQB1*0602 status and hypocretin-1 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a cohort of patients with hypersomnolence and to test International Classification of Sleep Disorders-2 (ICSD-2) criteria for hypersomnia of central origin.
Retrospective case series.
One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients with unexplained sleepiness and 282 controls recruited at St. Vincent's Hospital, Korea. The gold standard for diagnosis was ICSD-2 criteria. Patients and controls completed the Stanford Sleep Inventory, and agreed to HLA typing. Polysomnography (87%), Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (96%), and CSF hypocretin-1 measurements (53%) were conducted in patients.
Most patients (80%) could be classified using the ICSD-2. The 33 patients who could not be classified were without cataplexy (4 with low CSF hypocretin-1). These could not be included because of sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > or = 5/h, 84%) and/or because sleep prior to MSLT was less than 6 hours (27%). Narcolepsy with cataplexy cases were 92% HLA positive with low hypocretin-1. Cataplexy at interview was predicted by validated Stanford Sleep Inventory questions regarding cataplexy triggers. In contrast, cataplexy-like events were frequently reported in all groups, including controls. Cases with narcolepsy without cataplexy were frequently men (73%) and heterogeneous biologically (36% HLA positive, 40% with low CSF hypocretin-1). None of the controls had low CSF hypocretin-1, whereas 13% were HLA positive.
The ICSD-2 was easily applicable in cases with typical cataplexy. In these cases, the MSLT and further evaluations were almost always positive and may thus not always be needed. Many patients without cataplexy were difficult to classify because of difficulties in interpreting the MSLT in the presence of sleep apnea or reduced sleep.
研究一组嗜睡患者的脑脊液(CSF)中DQB1*0602状态和食欲素-1水平,并检验国际睡眠障碍分类第二版(ICSD-2)中关于中枢性嗜睡症的标准。
回顾性病例系列研究。
韩国圣文森特医院招募的163例原因不明的嗜睡患者及282例对照。诊断的金标准为ICSD-2标准。患者及对照完成斯坦福睡眠量表,并同意进行HLA分型。对患者进行了多导睡眠监测(87%)、多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)(96%)及脑脊液食欲素-1测定(53%)。
多数患者(80%)可依据ICSD-2进行分类。33例无法分类的患者无猝倒发作(4例脑脊液食欲素-1水平低)。由于存在睡眠呼吸暂停(呼吸暂停低通气指数≥5次/小时,84%)和/或MSLT前睡眠不足6小时(27%),这些患者未被纳入研究。伴猝倒发作的发作性睡病患者92% HLA阳性且食欲素-1水平低。访谈时的猝倒发作可通过斯坦福睡眠量表中关于猝倒发作触发因素的有效问题进行预测。相比之下,包括对照组在内的所有组中均频繁报告有类猝倒发作事件。无猝倒发作的发作性睡病患者多为男性(73%),生物学特征各异(36% HLA阳性,40%脑脊液食欲素-1水平低)。对照组中无一例脑脊液食欲素-1水平低,而13% HLA阳性。
ICSD-2易于应用于典型猝倒发作的病例。在这些病例中,MSLT及进一步评估几乎总是呈阳性,因此可能并非总是必要。许多无猝倒发作的患者难以分类,原因是存在睡眠呼吸暂停或睡眠减少时难以解读MSLT结果。