Clapisson Gilles, Salinas Cecile, Malacher Philippe, Michallet Mauricette, Philip Irene, Philip Thierry
Centre Leon Berard, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Bull Cancer. 2004 Apr;91(4):E97-102.
This study compares the cryopreservation of PBSC by means of HES 3% + DMSO 5% ina mechanical freezer with the cryopreservation of PBSC by means of DMSO 10% in an automated rate controlled freezer. The cells harvested from the same patient were divided in two equal parts and frozen according to both methods. Cryopreservation with HES +DMSO is better than DMSO alone in terms of viability (p<0.001) and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Forming Unit (GM-CFU) activity (p<0.05). The freezing curves differ essentially in the slope down after the surfusion peak. However, surfusion peaks are similar in both conditions. The relevance of mechanical freezing is the saving of time and the safety of such a procedure.
本研究比较了使用3%羟乙基淀粉(HES)+5%二甲基亚砜(DMSO)在机械冷冻机中对外周血干细胞(PBSC)进行冷冻保存,与使用10% DMSO在自动速率控制冷冻机中对PBSC进行冷冻保存的效果。从同一患者采集的细胞被分成两等份,并按照两种方法进行冷冻。就细胞活力(p<0.001)和粒-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(GM-CFU)活性(p<0.05)而言,使用HES+DMSO进行冷冻保存比单独使用DMSO更好。两种冷冻曲线在过冷峰后的下降斜率上有本质差异。然而,两种情况下的过冷峰相似。机械冷冻的优势在于节省时间以及该操作的安全性。