Kris Mark G, Hesketh Paul J, Herrstedt Jorn, Rittenberg Cynthia, Einhorn Lawrence H, Grunberg Steven, Koeller Jim, Olver Ian, Borjeson Sussanne, Ballatori Enzo
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Feb;13(2):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0699-x. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
This paper uses an evidence-based approach whenever possible to formulate recommendations, emphasizing the results of controlled trials concerning the best use of antiemetic agents. We address issues of dose, schedule, and route of administration of five selective 5-HT(3) antagonists. We conclude that for each of these five drugs, there is a plateau in therapeutic efficacy above which further dose escalation does not improve outcome. Furthermore, for all classes of antiemetic agents, a single dose is as effective as multiple doses or a continuous infusion. The oral route is as efficacious as the intravenous route of administration, even with chemotherapy of high emetic risk. Selective antagonists of the type 3 serotonin receptor (5-HT(3)) in combination with dexamethasone and aprepitant are the standard of care for the prevention of emesis following chemotherapy of high emetic risk.
本文尽可能采用循证方法来制定建议,着重强调关于止吐药最佳使用的对照试验结果。我们探讨了五种选择性5-羟色胺(5-HT)3拮抗剂的剂量、给药方案及给药途径问题。我们得出结论,对于这五种药物中的每一种,治疗效果都存在一个平台期,超过该剂量进一步增加剂量并不能改善治疗结果。此外,对于所有类别的止吐药,单次给药与多次给药或持续输注一样有效。即使是高致吐风险的化疗,口服给药途径与静脉给药途径同样有效。3型血清素受体(5-HT3)的选择性拮抗剂与地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦联合使用是预防高致吐风险化疗后呕吐的护理标准。