• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年胃癌的外科治疗

Surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma in the elderly.

作者信息

Coniglio Arianna, Tiberio Guido Alberto Massimo, Busti Monica, Gaverini Giacomo, Baiocchi Luca, Piardi Tullio, Ronconi Maurizio, Giulini Stefano Maria

机构信息

Surgical Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;88(4):201-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20153.

DOI:10.1002/jso.20153
PMID:15565628
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of gastric cancer is increasing in the elderly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of advanced age (> or =80 years) on morbidity, mortality and late outcome after curative surgery for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The cases of 30 octogenarians (Group A) with gastric cancer who underwent surgical treatment in our Institution from 1990 to 2003 were reviewed and compared to a simultaneous group of 228 younger patients (Group B).

RESULTS

The rate of resective and curative procedures was not different in the two groups, although the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) risk was significantly higher in the elderly (P < 0.001) and the lymphatic dissection was less extended in group A. In the two groups, the curability was directly correlated to the cancer stage, but not affected by the ASA risk. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups and were not related to the ASA risk. Considering the mortality for gastric cancer alone, the two groups showed a similar survival rate, only correlated to the cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In the elderly, an oncologically correct surgical procedure can safely be prosecuted with satisfactory immediate and late results.

摘要

背景与目的

老年人群中胃癌的发病率正在上升。本研究旨在评估高龄(≥80岁)对胃癌根治性手术后的发病率、死亡率及远期预后的影响。

方法

回顾了1990年至2003年在我院接受手术治疗的30例老年胃癌患者(A组)的病例,并与同期的228例年轻患者(B组)进行比较。

结果

两组间切除性和根治性手术的比例无差异,尽管老年患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)风险显著更高(P<0.001),且A组的淋巴结清扫范围较小。在两组中,根治性与癌症分期直接相关,但不受ASA风险的影响。两组的术后发病率和死亡率相似,且与ASA风险无关。仅考虑胃癌导致的死亡率,两组的生存率相似,仅与癌症分期相关。

结论

对于老年患者,实施肿瘤学上正确的手术操作可安全进行,并能获得令人满意的近期和远期效果。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma in the elderly.老年胃癌的外科治疗
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;88(4):201-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20153.
2
Mortality for gastric cancer in elderly patients.老年患者胃癌的死亡率。
J Surg Oncol. 2003 Nov;84(3):132-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.10303.
3
Evaluation of surgical treatment for patients with gastric cancer who are over 80 years of age.80岁以上胃癌患者手术治疗的评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 May-Jun;46(27):2074-80.
4
Outcome of gastric cancer surgery in elderly patients.老年患者胃癌手术的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1911-5.
5
[Comparison between treatment results for gastric cancer in younger and elderly patients].[年轻与老年胃癌患者治疗结果的比较]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Apr;127(4):270-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-31553.
6
Total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.胃癌全胃切除术
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jan-Feb;52(61):302-4.
7
Surgery for gastric cancer in patients older than 80 years of age.80岁以上患者的胃癌手术
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Jan-Feb;45(19):268-75.
8
Complications after extended (D2) and superextended (D3) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: analysis of potential risk factors.胃癌扩大(D2)及超扩大(D3)淋巴结清扫术后并发症:潜在危险因素分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jan;14(1):25-33. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9063-3. Epub 2006 Oct 7.
9
[Stomach cancer in the elderly patient].[老年患者的胃癌]
Minerva Chir. 1996 Jan-Feb;51(1-2):17-24.
10
[Risk factors for oncologic outcome after surgical treatment in patients with gastric cancer: a multivariable analysis of 1031 patients].[胃癌患者手术治疗后肿瘤学结局的危险因素:1031例患者的多变量分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;13(2):115-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Does the Age Matter?接受胃癌胃切除术患者的手术结果:年龄有影响吗?
J Gastric Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(3):157-159. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e20.
2
ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY BETWEEN YOUNG AND OLDER?青年人与老年人在腹腔镜胃切除术的发病率和死亡率方面存在差异吗?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022 Jan 5;34(3):e1617. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1617. eCollection 2022.
3
Extremely High Mortality Rate after a Successful Gastrectomy for Cancer in Older Adults.
老年患者胃癌成功切除术后极高的死亡率
J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jun;19(2):202-211. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e16. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Comparison of Outcomes for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients at Least 80 Years of Age Following Gastrectomy in the United States and China.中美两国 80 岁以上老年胃癌患者胃切除术后结局比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3629-3638. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6757-2. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
miR-598 acts as a tumor suppressor in human gastric cancer by targeting IGF-1R.miR-598通过靶向IGF-1R在人类胃癌中发挥肿瘤抑制作用。
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 May 17;11:2911-2923. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S166597. eCollection 2018.
6
Surgical treatment outcomes of patients with T1-T2 gastric cancer: does the age matter when excellent treatment results are expected?T1-T2 期胃癌患者的外科治疗效果:当期望获得优异的治疗效果时,年龄是否重要?
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr 16;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1388-4.
7
Effects of age on survival and morbidity in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.年龄对接受胃切除术的胃癌患者生存及发病情况的影响。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun 15;9(6):257-262. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i6.257.
8
Lymphadenectomy in elderly/high risk patients: should it be different?老年/高危患者的淋巴结清扫术:是否应有所不同?
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan 21;2:5. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.12.07. eCollection 2017.
9
Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in the elderly: experience from a UK centre.老年患者的腹腔镜辅助胃切除术:来自英国一家中心的经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Apr;99(4):325-331. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0344. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
10
Analysis of the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer in Extremely Old Patients.超高龄胃癌患者的临床病理特征分析
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):204-212. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.163. Epub 2016 Jun 27.