Sherman Michael S, Pillai Ajay, Jackson Ann, Heiman-Patterson Terry
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, USA.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):442-6. doi: 10.1177/0148607104028006442.
To assess the utility of standard equations for calculating caloric requirements in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Malnutrition substantially increases the risk of death in ALS. Weight loss can be stabilized and survival prolonged with early gastrostomy feeding. However the use of standard nutrition equations has not been validated in this population. We therefore compared measured caloric expenditure to 2 predictive equations in patients with varying stages of ALS.
Thirty-four patients were studied. Caloric expenditure and respiratory quotient (R) were measured using indirect calorimetry. Results were compared with the Harris-Benedict equation.
The prediction error for the Harris-Benedict equation was 18.6 + 14.9%. Limits of agreement showed this equation could overestimate caloric expenditure by 591 kcal/d and underestimate requirements by 677 kcal/d. R was >0.86 in 11 patients, suggesting overfeeding, and <0.8 in 15 patients, suggesting underfeeding. The difference between predicted and measured caloric expenditure did not correlate with disease severity, disease duration, or body mass index. Mechanically ventilated patients had higher than predicted energy expenditure.
We found that standard equations used to calculate energy expenditure were not valid for patients with ALS. Moreover, the majority of our patients were either overfed or underfed. As underfeeding can cause diaphragm impairment, and overfeeding can increase ventilatory load, indirect calorimetry should be considered in ALS patients to determine optimal caloric requirement.
评估标准方程在计算肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者热量需求中的效用。
营养不良会显著增加ALS患者的死亡风险。早期胃造口喂养可稳定体重减轻并延长生存期。然而,标准营养方程在该人群中的应用尚未得到验证。因此,我们比较了不同阶段ALS患者的实测热量消耗与两个预测方程。
对34例患者进行研究。采用间接测热法测量热量消耗和呼吸商(R)。将结果与哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程进行比较。
哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程的预测误差为18.6 + 14.9%。一致性界限表明该方程可能高估热量消耗591千卡/天,低估需求677千卡/天。11例患者的R>0.86,提示喂养过度,15例患者的R<0.8,提示喂养不足。预测热量消耗与实测热量消耗之间的差异与疾病严重程度、病程或体重指数无关。机械通气患者的能量消耗高于预测值。
我们发现用于计算能量消耗的标准方程对ALS患者无效。此外,我们的大多数患者要么喂养过度,要么喂养不足。由于喂养不足会导致膈肌功能受损,而喂养过度会增加通气负荷,因此应考虑对ALS患者进行间接测热法以确定最佳热量需求。