Pääbo Svante, Poinar Hendrik, Serre David, Jaenicke-Despres Viviane, Hebler Juliane, Rohland Nadin, Kuch Melanie, Krause Johannes, Vigilant Linda, Hofreiter Michael
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04013 Leipzig, Germany.
Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:645-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214.
About 20 years ago, DNA sequences were separately described from the quagga (a type of zebra) and an ancient Egyptian individual. What made these DNA sequences exceptional was that they were derived from 140- and 2400-year-old specimens. However, ancient DNA research, defined broadly as the retrieval of DNA sequences from museum specimens, archaeological finds, fossil remains, and other unusual sources of DNA, only really became feasible with the advent of techniques for the enzymatic amplification of specific DNA sequences. Today, reports of analyses of specimens hundreds, thousands, and even millions of years old are almost commonplace. But can all these results be believed? In this paper, we critically assess the state of ancient DNA research. In particular, we discuss the precautions and criteria necessary to ascertain to the greatest extent possible that results represent authentic ancient DNA sequences. We also highlight some significant results and areas of promising future research.
大约20年前,斑驴(一种斑马)和一位古埃及人的DNA序列被分别描述。这些DNA序列的特别之处在于它们来自于距今140年和2400年的标本。然而,广义上定义为从博物馆标本、考古发现、化石残骸以及其他不寻常的DNA来源中检索DNA序列的古DNA研究,只是在特定DNA序列酶促扩增技术出现后才真正变得可行。如今,对距今数百年、数千年甚至数百万年标本的分析报告几乎屡见不鲜。但所有这些结果都可信吗?在本文中,我们批判性地评估了古DNA研究的现状。特别是,我们讨论了为尽可能最大程度确定结果代表真实的古DNA序列所需的预防措施和标准。我们还强调了一些重要结果以及未来有前景的研究领域。