Hsu Edbert B, Jenckes Mollie W, Catlett Christina L, Robinson Karen A, Feuerstein Carolyn, Cosgrove Sara E, Green Gary B, Bass Eric B
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Jul-Sep;19(3):191-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001771.
Recently, mass-casualty incident (MCI) preparedness and training has received increasing attention at the hospital level.
To review the existing evidence on the effectiveness of disaster drills, technology-based interventions and tabletop exercises in training hospital staff to respond to an MCI.
A systematic, evidence-based process was conducted incorporating expert panel input and a literature review with the key terms: "mass casualty", "disaster", "disaster planning", and "drill". Paired investigators reviewed citation abstracts to identify articles that included evaluation of disaster training for hospital staff. Data were abstracted from the studies (e.g., MCI type, training intervention, staff targeted, objectives, evaluation methods, and results). Study quality was reviewed using standardized criteria.
Of 243 potentially relevant citations, 21 met the defined criteria. Studies varied in terms of targeted staff, learning objectives, outcomes, and evaluation methods. Most were characterized by significant limitations in design and evaluation methods. Seventeen addressed the effectiveness of disaster drills in training hospital staff in responding to an MCI, four addressed technology-based interventions, and none addressed tabletop exercises. The existing evidence suggests that hospital disaster drills are effective in allowing hospital employees to become familiar with disaster procedures, identify problems in different components of response (e.g., incident command, communications, triage, patient flow, materials and resources, and security) and provide the opportunity to apply lessons learned to disaster response. The strength of evidence on other training methods is insufficient to draw valid recommendations.
Current evidence on the effectiveness of MCI training for hospital staff is limited. A number of studies suggest that disaster drills can be effective in training hospital staff. However, more attention should be directed to evaluating the effectiveness of disaster training activities in a scientifically rigorous manner.
最近,医院层面的大规模伤亡事件(MCI)应急准备和培训受到了越来越多的关注。
回顾关于灾难演练、基于技术的干预措施和桌面演练在培训医院工作人员应对MCI方面有效性的现有证据。
采用系统的、基于证据的流程,纳入专家小组的意见并进行文献综述,关键词为:“大规模伤亡”、“灾难”、“灾难规划”和“演练”。由配对的研究人员审查文献摘要,以确定包含对医院工作人员灾难培训评估的文章。从研究中提取数据(例如,MCI类型、培训干预措施、目标工作人员、目标、评估方法和结果)。使用标准化标准对研究质量进行审查。
在243条潜在相关文献中,21条符合既定标准。研究在目标工作人员、学习目标、结果和评估方法方面各不相同。大多数研究在设计和评估方法上存在重大局限性。17项研究探讨了灾难演练在培训医院工作人员应对MCI方面的有效性,4项研究涉及基于技术的干预措施,没有研究涉及桌面演练。现有证据表明,医院灾难演练有效地使医院员工熟悉灾难程序,识别应对不同环节(如事件指挥、通信、分诊、患者流动、物资和资源以及安全)中的问题,并提供将所学经验应用于灾难应对的机会。关于其他培训方法的证据力度不足以得出有效的建议。
目前关于医院工作人员MCI培训有效性的证据有限。一些研究表明灾难演练在培训医院工作人员方面可能有效。然而,应更加注重以科学严谨的方式评估灾难培训活动的有效性。