Spindler Kurt P, Kuhn John E, Freedman Kevin Blake, Matthews Charles E, Dittus Robert S, Harrell Frank E
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1986-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546504271211.
Anterior cruciate ligament graft choice is controversial, with no evidence-based consensus available to guide decision making. The study design was evidence-based medicine systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. A literature review identified 9 randomized controlled trials comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Objective and subjective outcomes of interest included surgical technique, rehabilitation, instrumented laxity, isokinetic strength, patellofemoral pain, return to preinjury activity, and Tegner, Lysholm, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee-1991 scores. Additional surgery, graft failure, and complications were reviewed. Slight increased laxity on arthrometer testing was seen in the hamstring population in 3 of 7 studies. Pain with kneeling was greater for the patellar tendon population in 4 of 4 studies. Only 1 of 9 studies showed increased anterior knee pain in the patellar tendon group. Frequency of additional surgery seemed to be related to the fixation method and not graft type. No study reported a significant difference in graft failure between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Objective differences (range of motion, isokinetic strength, arthrometer testing) were not detected between groups in the majority of studies, suggesting that their sensitivity to detect clinical outcomes may be limited. Increased kneeling pain in the patellar tendon group was seen consistently in the studies evaluated. Subjective differences in anterior knee pain or return-to-activity level were not consistently observed in these studies. With numbers available, failure rates were not significantly different between groups. These findings suggest that graft type may not be the primary determinant for successful outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.
前交叉韧带移植物的选择存在争议,目前尚无基于证据的共识来指导决策。本研究设计为对评估髌腱与腘绳肌腱自体移植的随机对照试验进行基于循证医学的系统评价。文献综述确定了9项比较髌腱和腘绳肌腱自体移植的随机对照试验,并进行了基于证据的系统评价。感兴趣的客观和主观结果包括手术技术、康复情况、仪器测量的松弛度、等速肌力、髌股疼痛、恢复到伤前活动水平以及泰格纳、利绍姆、辛辛那提和国际膝关节文献委员会1991评分。还对再次手术、移植物失败和并发症进行了综述。在7项研究中的3项中,腘绳肌组在关节测量仪测试中显示出轻微的松弛度增加。在4项研究中的4项中,髌腱组跪姿时的疼痛更严重。9项研究中只有1项显示髌腱组前膝疼痛增加。再次手术的频率似乎与固定方法有关,而非移植物类型。没有研究报告髌腱和腘绳肌腱自体移植在移植物失败方面存在显著差异。在大多数研究中,两组之间未检测到客观差异(活动范围、等速肌力、关节测量仪测试),这表明它们检测临床结果的敏感性可能有限。在所评估的研究中,髌腱组跪姿疼痛增加的情况一致出现。在这些研究中,前膝疼痛或恢复活动水平的主观差异并不一致。就现有数据而言,两组之间的失败率没有显著差异。这些发现表明,移植物类型可能不是前交叉韧带手术后成功结果的主要决定因素。