Suppr超能文献

根据移植物类型比较前交叉韧带重建术后达到常见康复里程碑所需的时间。

Comparison of Time Needed to Meet Common Rehabilitation Milestones After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction According to Graft Type.

作者信息

Steiner Quinn, Walczak Brian E, Chumanov Elizabeth, Haraldsdottir Kristin, Watson Andrew M

机构信息

Departments of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Castle Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Rush Copley Medical Center, Rush University Health, Advancing Translational Orthopedics & Medical Sciences (ATOMs) Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 23;12(9):23259671241274687. doi: 10.1177/23259671241274687. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts is common in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). After ACLR, patients typically progress through specific rehabilitation milestones, and graft type may play a role in patient progression.

PURPOSE

To compare the time to meet rehabilitation milestones between BPTB and HT autografts after ACLR.

DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This was a single-institution study on patients who underwent ACLR with either BPTB or HT autograft between June 2018 and July 2021. The primary outcomes were time to meet return-to-sport criteria, including >90% limb symmetry index (LSI) for isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength, horizontal hop, 4-crossover hop, and single-hop height. The time to satisfaction of each criterion was compared between graft groups using Wilcoxon tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Included in the analysis were 410 participants who underwent ACLR with either BPTB (n = 232) or HT (n = 178). The BPTB group took longer to achieve >90% LSI for knee extension than HT (11.1 ± 4.1 vs 7.63 ± 2.8 months; < .001). Similarly, the BPTB group took longer than the HT group to achieve >90% LSI for horizontal hop (11.4 ± 3.5 vs 9.82 ± 2.8 months; < .001), 4-crossover hop (11.8 ± 3.6 vs 10.4 ± 2.8 months; = .002), and single-hop height testing (11 ± 3.7 vs 8.81 ± 3.2 months; < .001). The median time to achieve >90% LSI for hamstring strength was similar between groups (7.18 ± 3 vs 7.56 ± 3.1 months; = .2).

CONCLUSION

Patients that underwent ACLR with BPTB autograft took longer than patients with HT to meet commonly used postoperative rehabilitation milestones. Clinicians should consider these differences when guiding patients regarding graft choice, postoperative expectations, and rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

在膝关节前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)中,使用髌腱-骨(BPTB)自体移植物和腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物很常见。ACLR术后,患者通常会经历特定的康复阶段,移植物类型可能会对患者的康复进程产生影响。

目的

比较ACLR术后BPTB和HT自体移植物达到康复阶段的时间。

设计

队列研究;证据等级为3级。

方法

这是一项单机构研究,研究对象为2018年6月至2021年7月期间接受BPTB或HT自体移植物ACLR手术的患者。主要观察指标是达到重返运动标准的时间,包括等速股四头肌和腘绳肌力量的肢体对称指数(LSI)>90%、水平单腿跳、4次交叉单腿跳和单腿跳高度。使用Wilcoxon检验和Cox比例风险模型比较不同移植物组达到各标准的时间。

结果

纳入分析的有410名接受ACLR手术的参与者,其中使用BPTB移植物的有232例(n = 232),使用HT移植物的有178例(n = 178)。BPTB组达到膝关节伸展LSI>90%的时间比HT组长(11.1±4.1个月对7.63±2.8个月;P <.001)。同样,BPTB组达到水平单腿跳LSI>90%的时间比HT组长(11.4±3.5个月对9.82±2.8个月;P <.001)、4次交叉单腿跳(11.8±3.6个月对10.4±2.8个月;P = 0.002)和单腿跳高度测试(11±3.7个月对8.81±3.2个月;P <.001)。两组达到腘绳肌力量LSI>90%的中位时间相似(7.18±3个月对7.56±3.1个月;P = 0.2)。

结论

接受BPTB自体移植物ACLR手术的患者比接受HT移植物的患者达到常用术后康复阶段的时间更长。临床医生在指导患者进行移植物选择、术后预期和康复时应考虑这些差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验