Cook Kay E
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2005 Jan;15(1):129-38. doi: 10.1177/1049732304267751.
In this article, the author outlines the need for a critical research method in the field of health promotion to explore the determinants of health. These determinants, including healthy child development, employment and working conditions, and education, for example, underlie many of the health issues that individuals experience. They are, in turn, influenced by nebulous factors such as patterns of inequality, and cultural norms, which are difficult to research using conventional methodologies. The author provides an overview of critical ethnography as a method for health promotion research. She describes specific data collection and analysis techniques, with the addition of critical discourse analysis to add scope to ethnographic findings. She concludes with an overview of the congruence between critical ethnography and health promotion research, including a discussion of the differences between critical ethnography and participatory action research.
在本文中,作者概述了健康促进领域采用批判性研究方法以探究健康决定因素的必要性。例如,这些决定因素包括儿童健康发展、就业与工作条件以及教育,它们构成了个人所经历的许多健康问题的基础。反过来,它们又受到诸如不平等模式和文化规范等模糊因素的影响,而使用传统方法很难对这些因素进行研究。作者概述了批判性民族志作为健康促进研究方法的情况。她描述了具体的数据收集和分析技术,并增加了批判性话语分析以拓展民族志研究结果的范围。她最后概述了批判性民族志与健康促进研究之间的一致性,包括对批判性民族志与参与式行动研究之间差异的讨论。