• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赞比亚关于社会研究的跨部门辩论加强了为孕产妇生存而建立的联盟、宣传及行动。

Intersectoral debate on social research strengthens alliances, advocacy and action for maternal survival in Zambia.

作者信息

Manandhar Mary, Maimbolwa Margaret, Muulu Elson, Mulenga Mary Mwange, O'Donovan Diarmuid

机构信息

Health Promotion Research Centre and Department of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan036. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/dan036
PMID:19008243
Abstract

The Health Promotion Research Centre of the National University of Ireland, Galway and the University of Zambia's School of Medicine conducted operational research to understand and address the socio-cultural and gender contexts of maternal survival. Together with an analytical policy and programming review and qualitative research, the project process also involved the convening of 'Interest Group' meetings involving intersectoral stakeholders at Central (Lusaka) and Provincial (Kasama) levels. These meetings aimed to catalyse debate and stimulate advocacy on the project theme by using discussion of qualitative research as entry point. Participants came from government departments, civil society groups, the indigenous health system, academia, technical provider associations, and media, advocacy and human rights organisations. We found that engagement in Interest Groups was successful at Provincial level with lively participation from civil society, media and advocacy stakeholders and strong engagement by the health system. The process was welcomed as an opportunity to fill gaps in understanding about underlying social determinants of health and jointly explore intervention approaches. Overburdened government staff at central level faced with disease-focused interventions rather than underlying contextual determinants, and a weak culture of health sector engagement with civil society, academics and activists, contributed to less successful functioning in Lusaka. Final Dissemination and Discussion Events incorporated material from Interest Group Meetings to stimulate wider discussion and make recommendations. This project highlights the potential value of intersectoral stakeholder discussions from the inception stage of research to stimulate intersectoral exchange and alliance building, inform advocacy, and catalyse the process of research into action.

摘要

爱尔兰国立大学戈尔韦分校的健康促进研究中心与赞比亚大学医学院开展了行动研究,以了解并应对孕产妇生存的社会文化和性别背景。该项目过程除了进行分析性政策与规划审查以及定性研究外,还召集了中央(卢萨卡)和省级(卡萨马)层面跨部门利益相关者参与的“利益集团”会议。这些会议旨在以定性研究讨论为切入点,引发关于项目主题的辩论并推动宣传工作。与会者来自政府部门、民间社会团体、本土卫生系统、学术界、技术供应商协会以及媒体、宣传和人权组织。我们发现,省级层面的利益集团参与活动取得了成功,民间社会、媒体和宣传利益相关者积极参与,卫生系统也深度介入。该过程受到欢迎,被视为填补对健康潜在社会决定因素理解空白并共同探索干预方法的契机。中央层面负担过重的政府工作人员面对的是针对疾病的干预措施而非潜在的背景决定因素,且卫生部门与民间社会、学术界和活动人士的互动文化薄弱,这导致卢萨卡的活动成效较差。最终的传播与讨论活动纳入了利益集团会议的材料,以激发更广泛的讨论并提出建议。该项目凸显了从研究初始阶段开展跨部门利益相关者讨论的潜在价值,以促进跨部门交流与联盟建设、为宣传提供信息并推动研究转化为行动的进程。

相似文献

1
Intersectoral debate on social research strengthens alliances, advocacy and action for maternal survival in Zambia.赞比亚关于社会研究的跨部门辩论加强了为孕产妇生存而建立的联盟、宣传及行动。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan036. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
2
Mental health care roles of non-medical primary health and social care services.非医学类基层医疗卫生与社会护理服务在精神卫生保健方面的作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00800.x. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
3
Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion.运用批判性人种志研究法探究健康促进中的问题。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Jan;15(1):129-38. doi: 10.1177/1049732304267751.
4
Stakeholder perceptions of aid coordination implementation in the Zambian health sector.利益相关者对赞比亚卫生部门援助协调实施情况的看法。
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
5
Exploring the partnership networks of churches and church-affiliated organisations in health promotion.探索教会及与教会相关组织在健康促进方面的伙伴关系网络。
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(2):148-57. doi: 10.1071/PY11016.
6
Participatory research in public health: creating innovative alliances for health.公共卫生领域的参与式研究:建立创新的健康联盟。
Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):440-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
7
An intersectoral network for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Alberta healthy living network.一个用于慢性病预防的跨部门网络:以艾伯塔省健康生活网络为例。
Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(4):153-61.
8
Barriers and facilitators to partnership working between Early Intervention Services and the voluntary and community sector.早期干预服务机构与志愿及社区部门合作的障碍与促进因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Sep;16(5):493-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00760.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
9
Harnessing complexity: taking advantage of context and relationships in dissemination of school-based interventions.驾驭复杂性:在传播校本干预措施中利用背景和关系
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Mar;11(2):259-67. doi: 10.1177/1524839907313723. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
10
Public health efforts to build a surveillance system for child maltreatment mortality: lessons learned for stakeholder engagement.公共卫生努力构建儿童虐待致死监测系统:利益攸关方参与的经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):542-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182126b6b.

引用本文的文献

1
District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India, on engaging the private health sector in sharing health-related data.低收入环境下的地区卫生决策:印度北方邦关于促使私营卫生部门共享健康相关数据的一项定性研究
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii35-ii46. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv117.