Suppr超能文献

代孕:是否有理由进行法律禁止?

Surrogacy: is there a case for legal prohibition?

作者信息

Goold Imogen

机构信息

Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2004 Nov;12(2):205-16.

Abstract

Surrogacy arrangements are a complex and challenging issue for legal regulation. On the one hand, if we wish to promote personal autonomy and enable the infertile to experience parenthood, there is a case for allowing these arrangements to proceed. However, objections to legal sanctioning of surrogacy include concerns for the surrogate and the child born through the surrogacy arrangement. Legally sanctioning surrogacy may also adversely affect social conceptions of women's roles or may be considered a form of commodifying women's reproductive capacities. This article examines these challenges to allowing surrogacy, but concludes that surrogacy should not be legally prohibited.

摘要

代孕安排对于法律监管而言是一个复杂且具有挑战性的问题。一方面,如果我们希望促进个人自主权并使不孕者能够体验为人父母的感觉,那么就有理由允许这些安排继续进行。然而,对代孕进行法律制裁的反对意见包括对代孕女性以及通过代孕安排出生的孩子的担忧。对代孕进行法律制裁也可能会对社会对女性角色的观念产生不利影响,或者可能被视为将女性生殖能力商品化的一种形式。本文审视了允许代孕所面临的这些挑战,但得出的结论是代孕不应被法律禁止。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验